There is no need to have the 'struct drm_framebuffer *fb' variable static since new value always be assigned before use it.
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing yuehaibing@huawei.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c index 860da05..c2955d3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void fb_destroy(struct drm_framebuffer *fb) const struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cmd) { struct xen_drm_front_drm_info *drm_info = dev->dev_private; - static struct drm_framebuffer *fb; + struct drm_framebuffer *fb; struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj; int ret;
On 1/26/19 2:05 PM, YueHaibing wrote:
There is no need to have the 'struct drm_framebuffer *fb' variable static since new value always be assigned before use it.
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing yuehaibing@huawei.com
Good catch, thank you! Reviewed-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c index 860da05..c2955d3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void fb_destroy(struct drm_framebuffer *fb) const struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cmd) { struct xen_drm_front_drm_info *drm_info = dev->dev_private;
- static struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
- struct drm_framebuffer *fb; struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj; int ret;
On 1/28/19 8:36 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 1/26/19 2:05 PM, YueHaibing wrote:
There is no need to have the 'struct drm_framebuffer *fb' variable static since new value always be assigned before use it.
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing yuehaibing@huawei.com
Good catch, thank you! Reviewed-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko oleksandr_andrushchenko@epam.com
If nobody objects I'll apply this to drm-misc-fixes next Monday
drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c index 860da05..c2955d3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void fb_destroy(struct drm_framebuffer *fb) const struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cmd) { struct xen_drm_front_drm_info *drm_info = dev->dev_private; - static struct drm_framebuffer *fb; + struct drm_framebuffer *fb; struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj; int ret;
On 1/26/19 2:05 PM, YueHaibing wrote:
There is no need to have the 'struct drm_framebuffer *fb' variable static since new value always be assigned before use it.
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing yuehaibing@huawei.com
drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c index 860da05..c2955d3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/xen/xen_drm_front_kms.c @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static void fb_destroy(struct drm_framebuffer *fb) const struct drm_mode_fb_cmd2 *mode_cmd) { struct xen_drm_front_drm_info *drm_info = dev->dev_private;
- static struct drm_framebuffer *fb;
- struct drm_framebuffer *fb; struct drm_gem_object *gem_obj; int ret;
Applied to drm-misc-next
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org