The documentation tools interpret drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs as function and there appears to be no way of inline-documenting constants. This results in a warning by 'make htmldocs'. For now, removing drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs from generated documentation works around the issue.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann tzimmermann@suse.de Fixes: 5c9dcacfe56673555540933017c54e8f39e947cb --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c index 7380a06a582c..42ad80888df7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_vram_helper.c @@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ int drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_verify_access(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_gem_vram_bo_driver_verify_access);
-/** +/* * drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs - Functions for &struct drm_vram_mm * * Most users of @struct drm_gem_vram_object will also use
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 01:13:30PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
The documentation tools interpret drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs as function and there appears to be no way of inline-documenting constants.
-/** +/*
- drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs - Functions for &struct drm_vram_mm
"struct drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs" ?
(see include/drm/drm_gem.h where struct drm_gem_object_funcs is documented that way).
cheers, Gerd
Hi
Am 05.06.19 um 11:03 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 01:13:30PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
The documentation tools interpret drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs as function and there appears to be no way of inline-documenting constants.
-/** +/*
- drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs - Functions for &struct drm_vram_mm
"struct drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs" ?
(see include/drm/drm_gem.h where struct drm_gem_object_funcs is documented that way).
The documented source line is
const struct drm_vram_mm_funcs drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs = {
and I tried to document the purpose of the constant 'drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs'.
Documenting global constants is not described in the kernel guide and I could not find a source-code example either. Function and struct style with '-' didn't work; member-field style with '@' neither. The only way seems to be adding it to an .rst file in Documentation. But then it's not part of the API documentation, but somewhere in the text.
Best regards Thomas
cheers, Gerd
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 11:59:04AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 05.06.19 um 11:03 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 01:13:30PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
The documentation tools interpret drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs as function and there appears to be no way of inline-documenting constants.
-/** +/*
- drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs - Functions for &struct drm_vram_mm
"struct drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs" ?
(see include/drm/drm_gem.h where struct drm_gem_object_funcs is documented that way).
The documented source line is
const struct drm_vram_mm_funcs drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs = {
and I tried to document the purpose of the constant 'drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs'.
Ah. Missed that detail.
Documenting global constants is not described in the kernel guide and I could not find a source-code example either. Function and struct style with '-' didn't work; member-field style with '@' neither. The only way seems to be adding it to an .rst file in Documentation. But then it's not part of the API documentation, but somewhere in the text.
Ok, patch is fine then.
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann kraxel@redhat.com
(can you commit & push yourself meanwhile?)
cheers, Gerd
Hi
Am 05.06.19 um 17:58 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 11:59:04AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 05.06.19 um 11:03 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 01:13:30PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
The documentation tools interpret drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs as function and there appears to be no way of inline-documenting constants.
-/** +/*
- drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs - Functions for &struct drm_vram_mm
"struct drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs" ?
(see include/drm/drm_gem.h where struct drm_gem_object_funcs is documented that way).
The documented source line is
const struct drm_vram_mm_funcs drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs = {
and I tried to document the purpose of the constant 'drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs'.
Ah. Missed that detail.
Documenting global constants is not described in the kernel guide and I could not find a source-code example either. Function and struct style with '-' didn't work; member-field style with '@' neither. The only way seems to be adding it to an .rst file in Documentation. But then it's not part of the API documentation, but somewhere in the text.
Ok, patch is fine then.
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann kraxel@redhat.com
Thanks.
(can you commit & push yourself meanwhile?)
Not yet. The respective bug report is still open.
Best regards Thomas
cheers, Gerd
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 08:39:12AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 05.06.19 um 17:58 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 11:59:04AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 05.06.19 um 11:03 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 01:13:30PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
The documentation tools interpret drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs as function and there appears to be no way of inline-documenting constants.
-/** +/*
- drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs - Functions for &struct drm_vram_mm
"struct drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs" ?
(see include/drm/drm_gem.h where struct drm_gem_object_funcs is documented that way).
The documented source line is
const struct drm_vram_mm_funcs drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs = {
and I tried to document the purpose of the constant 'drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs'.
Ah. Missed that detail.
Documenting global constants is not described in the kernel guide and I could not find a source-code example either. Function and struct style with '-' didn't work; member-field style with '@' neither. The only way seems to be adding it to an .rst file in Documentation. But then it's not part of the API documentation, but somewhere in the text.
Ok, patch is fine then.
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann kraxel@redhat.com
Thanks.
(can you commit & push yourself meanwhile?)
Not yet. The respective bug report is still open.
Ok, I'll push it then.
cheers, Gerd
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 9:45 AM Gerd Hoffmann kraxel@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 08:39:12AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 05.06.19 um 17:58 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 11:59:04AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 05.06.19 um 11:03 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 01:13:30PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
The documentation tools interpret drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs as function and there appears to be no way of inline-documenting constants.
-/** +/*
- drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs - Functions for &struct drm_vram_mm
"struct drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs" ?
(see include/drm/drm_gem.h where struct drm_gem_object_funcs is documented that way).
The documented source line is
const struct drm_vram_mm_funcs drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs = {
and I tried to document the purpose of the constant 'drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs'.
Ah. Missed that detail.
Documenting global constants is not described in the kernel guide and I could not find a source-code example either. Function and struct style with '-' didn't work; member-field style with '@' neither. The only way seems to be adding it to an .rst file in Documentation. But then it's not part of the API documentation, but somewhere in the text.
Ok, patch is fine then.
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann kraxel@redhat.com
Thanks.
(can you commit & push yourself meanwhile?)
Not yet. The respective bug report is still open.
Ok, I'll push it then.
You should have commit rights for drm-misc, I just checked. At least there's a tzimmermann account in the drm-misc group.
https://drm.pages.freedesktop.org/maintainer-tools/getting-started.html
... to get you going. If things don't work pls ping on #dri-devel on freenode. -Daniel
Hi
Am 06.06.19 um 09:49 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 9:45 AM Gerd Hoffmann kraxel@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 08:39:12AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 05.06.19 um 17:58 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 11:59:04AM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
Hi
Am 05.06.19 um 11:03 schrieb Gerd Hoffmann:
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 01:13:30PM +0200, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > The documentation tools interpret drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs as function and > there appears to be no way of inline-documenting constants.
> -/** > +/* > * drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs - Functions for &struct drm_vram_mm
"struct drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs" ?
(see include/drm/drm_gem.h where struct drm_gem_object_funcs is documented that way).
The documented source line is
const struct drm_vram_mm_funcs drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs = {
and I tried to document the purpose of the constant 'drm_gem_vram_mm_funcs'.
Ah. Missed that detail.
Documenting global constants is not described in the kernel guide and I could not find a source-code example either. Function and struct style with '-' didn't work; member-field style with '@' neither. The only way seems to be adding it to an .rst file in Documentation. But then it's not part of the API documentation, but somewhere in the text.
Ok, patch is fine then.
Acked-by: Gerd Hoffmann kraxel@redhat.com
Thanks.
(can you commit & push yourself meanwhile?)
Not yet. The respective bug report is still open.
Ok, I'll push it then.
You should have commit rights for drm-misc, I just checked. At least there's a tzimmermann account in the drm-misc group.
Thanks for the update.
Gerd, if you haven't pushed it yet I'm going to add this patch to the tree.
Best regards Thomas
https://drm.pages.freedesktop.org/maintainer-tools/getting-started.html
... to get you going. If things don't work pls ping on #dri-devel on freenode. -Daniel
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Daniel Vetter -
Gerd Hoffmann -
Thomas Zimmermann