From: Anisse Astier anisse@astier.eu
[ Upstream commit 0b464ca3e0dd3cec65f28bc6d396d82f19080f69 ]
Panel is 800x1280, but mounted on a laptop form factor, sideways.
Signed-off-by: Anisse Astier anisse@astier.eu Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula jani.nikula@intel.com Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211229222200.53128-3-anisse@... Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c index 448c2f2d803a..f5ab891731d0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c @@ -166,6 +166,12 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id orientation_data[] = { DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "MicroPC"), }, .driver_data = (void *)&lcd720x1280_rightside_up, + }, { /* GPD Win Max */ + .matches = { + DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "GPD"), + DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "G1619-01"), + }, + .driver_data = (void *)&lcd800x1280_rightside_up, }, { /* * GPD Pocket, note that the the DMI data is less generic then * it seems, devices with a board-vendor of "AMI Corporation"
From: Xin Xiong xiongx18@fudan.edu.cn
[ Upstream commit dfced44f122c500004a48ecc8db516bb6a295a1b ]
This issue takes place in an error path in amdgpu_cs_fence_to_handle_ioctl(). When `info->in.what` falls into default case, the function simply returns -EINVAL, forgetting to decrement the reference count of a dma_fence obj, which is bumped earlier by amdgpu_cs_get_fence(). This may result in reference count leaks.
Fix it by decreasing the refcount of specific object before returning the error code.
Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Signed-off-by: Xin Xiong xiongx18@fudan.edu.cn Signed-off-by: Xin Tan tanxin.ctf@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c index 82823d9a8ba8..fddeea2b17e5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c @@ -1542,6 +1542,7 @@ int amdgpu_cs_fence_to_handle_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data, return 0;
default: + dma_fence_put(fence); return -EINVAL; } }
From: Rajneesh Bhardwaj rajneesh.bhardwaj@amd.com
[ Upstream commit 447c7997b62a5115ba4da846dcdee4fc12298a6a ]
Noticed the below warning while running a pytorch workload on vega10 GPUs. Change to trylock to avoid conflicts with already held reservation locks.
[ +0.000003] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected [ +0.000003] 5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030 Not tainted [ +0.000004] -------------------------------------------- [ +0.000002] python/4822 is trying to acquire lock: [ +0.000004] ffff932cd9a259f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000203] but task is already holding lock: [ +0.000003] ffff932cbb7181f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm] [ +0.000017] other info that might help us debug this: [ +0.000002] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ +0.000003] CPU0 [ +0.000002] ---- [ +0.000002] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ +0.000004] lock(reservation_ww_class_mutex); [ +0.000003] *** DEADLOCK ***
[ +0.000002] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[ +0.000003] 7 locks held by python/4822: [ +0.000003] #0: ffff932c4ac028d0 (&process->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x10b/0x320 [amdgpu] [ +0.000232] #1: ffff932c55e830a8 (&info->lock#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x64/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000241] #2: ffff932cc45b5e68 (&(*mem)->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0xdf/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000236] #3: ffffb2b35606fd28 (reservation_ww_class_acquire){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x232/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000235] #4: ffff932cbb7181f8 (reservation_ww_class_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: ttm_eu_reserve_buffers+0x270/0x470 [ttm] [ +0.000015] #5: ffffffffc045f700 (*(sspp++)){....}-{0:0}, at: drm_dev_enter+0x5/0xa0 [drm] [ +0.000038] #6: ffff932c52da7078 (&vm->eviction_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0xd5/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000195] stack backtrace: [ +0.000003] CPU: 11 PID: 4822 Comm: python Not tainted 5.13.0-kfd-rajneesh #1030 [ +0.000005] Hardware name: GIGABYTE MZ01-CE0-00/MZ01-CE0-00, BIOS F02 08/29/2018 [ +0.000003] Call Trace: [ +0.000003] dump_stack+0x6d/0x89 [ +0.000010] __lock_acquire+0xb93/0x1a90 [ +0.000009] lock_acquire+0x25d/0x2d0 [ +0.000005] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000184] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110 [ +0.000006] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000184] __ww_mutex_lock.constprop.17+0xca/0x1060 [ +0.000007] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000183] ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270 [ +0.000005] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa2/0x110 [ +0.000006] ? amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000183] amdgpu_bo_release_notify+0xc4/0x160 [amdgpu] [ +0.000185] ttm_bo_release+0x4c6/0x580 [ttm] [ +0.000010] amdgpu_bo_unref+0x1a/0x30 [amdgpu] [ +0.000183] amdgpu_vm_free_table+0x76/0xa0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000189] amdgpu_vm_free_pts+0xb8/0xf0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000189] amdgpu_vm_update_ptes+0x411/0x770 [amdgpu] [ +0.000191] amdgpu_vm_bo_update_mapping+0x324/0x4f0 [amdgpu] [ +0.000191] amdgpu_vm_bo_update+0x251/0x610 [amdgpu] [ +0.000191] update_gpuvm_pte+0xcc/0x290 [amdgpu] [ +0.000229] ? amdgpu_vm_bo_map+0xd7/0x130 [amdgpu] [ +0.000190] amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm_map_memory_to_gpu+0x912/0xf60 [amdgpu] [ +0.000234] kfd_ioctl_map_memory_to_gpu+0x182/0x320 [amdgpu] [ +0.000218] kfd_ioctl+0x2b9/0x600 [amdgpu] [ +0.000216] ? kfd_ioctl_unmap_memory_from_gpu+0x270/0x270 [amdgpu] [ +0.000216] ? lock_release+0x13f/0x270 [ +0.000006] ? __fget_files+0x107/0x1e0 [ +0.000007] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x8b/0xd0 [ +0.000007] do_syscall_64+0x36/0x70 [ +0.000004] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ +0.000007] RIP: 0033:0x7fbff90a7317 [ +0.000004] Code: b3 66 90 48 8b 05 71 4b 2d 00 64 c7 00 26 00 00 00 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 b8 10 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 41 4b 2d 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 [ +0.000005] RSP: 002b:00007fbe301fe648 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010 [ +0.000006] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fbcc402d820 RCX: 00007fbff90a7317 [ +0.000003] RDX: 00007fbe301fe690 RSI: 00000000c0184b18 RDI: 0000000000000004 [ +0.000003] RBP: 00007fbe301fe690 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007fbcc402d880 [ +0.000003] R10: 0000000002001000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00000000c0184b18 [ +0.000003] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: 00007fbf689593a0 R15: 00007fbcc402d820
Cc: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Cc: Felix Kuehling Felix.Kuehling@amd.com Cc: Alex Deucher Alexander.Deucher@amd.com
Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling Felix.Kuehling@amd.com Signed-off-by: Rajneesh Bhardwaj rajneesh.bhardwaj@amd.com Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c index 532d1842f6a3..4cc0dd494a42 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_object.c @@ -1305,7 +1305,8 @@ void amdgpu_bo_release_notify(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo) !(abo->flags & AMDGPU_GEM_CREATE_VRAM_WIPE_ON_RELEASE)) return;
- dma_resv_lock(bo->base.resv, NULL); + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dma_resv_trylock(bo->base.resv))) + return;
r = amdgpu_fill_buffer(abo, AMDGPU_POISON, bo->base.resv, &fence); if (!WARN_ON(r)) {
From: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com
[ Upstream commit 9dff13f9edf755a15f6507874185a3290c1ae8bb ]
The driver has a fallback so make the message informational rather than a warning. The driver has a fallback if the Component Resource Association Table (CRAT) is missing, so make this informational now.
Bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/1906 Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling Felix.Kuehling@amd.com Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin sashal@kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.c index 66387caf966e..3685e89415d5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_crat.c @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ int kfd_create_crat_image_acpi(void **crat_image, size_t *size) /* Fetch the CRAT table from ACPI */ status = acpi_get_table(CRAT_SIGNATURE, 0, &crat_table); if (status == AE_NOT_FOUND) { - pr_warn("CRAT table not found\n"); + pr_info("CRAT table not found\n"); return -ENODATA; } else if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { const char *err = acpi_format_exception(status);
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Sasha Levin