Ensure i915_vma_pin_iomap and vma_unpin are done with dpt->obj lock held.
I don't think there's much of a point in merging intel_dpt_pin() with intel_pin_fb_obj_dpt(), they touch different objects.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c | 40 +++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c index de62bd77b15e..edd6f1aa2626 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c @@ -121,32 +121,42 @@ struct i915_vma *intel_dpt_pin(struct i915_address_space *vm) intel_wakeref_t wakeref; struct i915_vma *vma; void __iomem *iomem; + struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww; + int err;
wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&i915->runtime_pm); atomic_inc(&i915->gpu_error.pending_fb_pin);
- vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(dpt->obj, NULL, 0, 4096, - HAS_LMEM(i915) ? 0 : PIN_MAPPABLE); - if (IS_ERR(vma)) - goto err; + for_i915_gem_ww(&ww, err, true) { + err = i915_gem_object_lock(dpt->obj, &ww); + if (err) + continue;
- iomem = i915_vma_pin_iomap(vma); - i915_vma_unpin(vma); - if (IS_ERR(iomem)) { - vma = ERR_CAST(iomem); - goto err; - } + vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(dpt->obj, &ww, NULL, 0, 4096, + HAS_LMEM(i915) ? 0 : PIN_MAPPABLE); + if (IS_ERR(vma)) { + err = PTR_ERR(vma); + continue; + } + + iomem = i915_vma_pin_iomap(vma); + i915_vma_unpin(vma);
- dpt->vma = vma; - dpt->iomem = iomem; + if (IS_ERR(iomem)) { + err = PTR_ERR(vma); + continue; + }
- i915_vma_get(vma); + dpt->vma = vma; + dpt->iomem = iomem; + + i915_vma_get(vma); + }
-err: atomic_dec(&i915->gpu_error.pending_fb_pin); intel_runtime_pm_put(&i915->runtime_pm, wakeref);
- return vma; + return err ? ERR_PTR(err) : vma; }
void intel_dpt_unpin(struct i915_address_space *vm)
From: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c:145:6-12: inconsistent IS_ERR and PTR_ERR on line 146.
PTR_ERR should access the value just tested by IS_ERR
Semantic patch information: There can be false positives in the patch case, where it is the call to IS_ERR that is wrong.
Generated by: scripts/coccinelle/tests/odd_ptr_err.cocci
CC: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Signed-off-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com ---
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Maarten-Lankhorst/drm-i915-Add-ww-c... base: git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm-tip drm-tip :::::: branch date: 17 hours ago :::::: commit date: 17 hours ago
intel_dpt.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dpt.c @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ struct i915_vma *intel_dpt_pin(struct i9 i915_vma_unpin(vma);
if (IS_ERR(iomem)) { - err = PTR_ERR(vma); + err = PTR_ERR(iomem); continue; }
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org