On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote:
Hi,
since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's) I cannot resume from suspend. The last thing I see with no_console_suspend is: i915: No ACPI video bus found
But I used to see the message always, so this is no difference. Any idea before I start bisecting?
Well, what's the next message you normally see with no_console_suspend?
[drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0
Adding DRM and intel guys.
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Jiri Slaby jslaby@suse.cz wrote:
On 01/14/2013 01:56 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Monday, January 14, 2013 11:11:52 AM Jiri Slaby wrote:
Hi,
since friday's -next (the last known to be working is the last monday's) I cannot resume from suspend. The last thing I see with no_console_suspend is: i915: No ACPI video bus found
But I used to see the message always, so this is no difference. Any idea before I start bisecting?
Well, what's the next message you normally see with no_console_suspend?
[drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0
Adding DRM and intel guys.
Hi Jiri, the dmesgs for both cases with drm.debug=0xe module param might give us some clues.
Does it work without no_console_suspend?
BR, Jani.
On 01/16/2013 10:20 AM, Jani Nikula wrote:
Hi Jiri, the dmesgs for both cases with drm.debug=0xe module param might give us some clues.
Does it work without no_console_suspend?
Hi, no, it does not work either way. But what I found out with debug enabled, that it's a completely different problem: in ACPI. The kernel is spinning acpi_rs_get_aml_length. I'll report details without CCing DRM people.
thanks,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Jani Nikula -
Jiri Slaby