Commit 08295b3b5bee ("Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes") introduced a reference in the documentation to a function that was removed in an earlier commit.
It also forgot to remove a call to debug_mutex_add_waiter() which is now unconditionally called by __mutex_add_waiter().
Fix those issues.
Fixes: 08295b3b5bee ("Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes") Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom thellstrom@vmware.com --- kernel/locking/mutex.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c index 1a81a1257b3f..3f8a35104285 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c +++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c @@ -389,7 +389,7 @@ static bool __ww_mutex_wound(struct mutex *lock, /* * wake_up_process() paired with set_current_state() * inserts sufficient barriers to make sure @owner either sees - * it's wounded in __ww_mutex_lock_check_stamp() or has a + * it's wounded in __ww_mutex_check_kill() or has a * wakeup pending to re-read the wounded state. */ if (owner != current) @@ -946,7 +946,6 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass, }
debug_mutex_lock_common(lock, &waiter); - debug_mutex_add_waiter(lock, &waiter, current);
lock_contended(&lock->dep_map, ip);
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 04:07:08PM +0200, Thomas Hellstrom wrote:
Commit 08295b3b5bee ("Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes") introduced a reference in the documentation to a function that was removed in an earlier commit.
It also forgot to remove a call to debug_mutex_add_waiter() which is now unconditionally called by __mutex_add_waiter().
Fix those issues.
Fixes: 08295b3b5bee ("Implement an algorithm choice for Wound-Wait mutexes") Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom thellstrom@vmware.com
Thanks!
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org