[PATCH, RESEND] drm: avoid uninitialized timestamp use in wait_vblank - dri-devel - freedesktop.org experimental mailing list

25 Feb 2016

gcc warns about the timestamp in drm_wait_vblank being possibly
used without an initialization:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c: In function 'drm_wait_vblank':
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:1755:28: warning: 'now.tv_usec' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
   vblwait->reply.tval_usec = now.tv_usec;
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c:1754:27: warning: 'now.tv_sec' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
   vblwait->reply.tval_sec = now.tv_sec;
This can happen if drm_vblank_count_and_time() returns 0 in its
error path. To sanitize the error case, I'm changing that function
to return a zero timestamp when it fails.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de
Fixes: e6ae8687a87b ("drm: idiot-proof vblank")
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
I'm going through the maybe-unused warnings in randconfig builds, this one is
apparently not a false positive, although it only happens if something
else has already gone wrong.
Originally sent out on Jan 13, but I received no reply, so resending now.

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
index 881c5a6c180c..6f41ddfbe061 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
@@ -997,8 +997,10 @@ u32 drm_vblank_count_and_time(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe,
    int count = DRM_TIMESTAMP_MAXRETRIES;
    u32 cur_vblank;
-	if (WARN_ON(pipe >= dev->num_crtcs))
+	if (WARN_ON(pipe >= dev->num_crtcs)) {
+		*vblanktime = (struct timeval) { 0 };
    	return 0;
+	}
/*
     * Vblank timestamps are read lockless. To ensure consistency the vblank
-- 
2.7.0


    