From: Jerome Glisse jglisse@redhat.com
It seems some of those IGP dislike non dma32 page despite what documentation says. Fix regression since we allowed non dma32 pages. It seems it only affect some revision of those IGP chips as we don't know which one just force dma32 for all of them.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785375
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse jglisse@redhat.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c index 066c98b..8867400 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ int radeon_device_init(struct radeon_device *rdev, if (rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_AGP) rdev->need_dma32 = true; if ((rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_PCI) && - (rdev->family < CHIP_RS400)) + (rdev->family <= CHIP_RS740)) rdev->need_dma32 = true;
dma_bits = rdev->need_dma32 ? 32 : 40;
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:50 PM, j.glisse@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jerome Glisse jglisse@redhat.com
It seems some of those IGP dislike non dma32 page despite what documentation says. Fix regression since we allowed non dma32 pages. It seems it only affect some revision of those IGP chips as we don't know which one just force dma32 for all of them.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785375
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse jglisse@redhat.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This is upstream commit 4a2b6662c3632176b4fdf012243dd3751367bf1f. I don't see it queued up in the stable-queue, so I thought I'd point it out in case it was missed.
josh
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c index 066c98b..8867400 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c @@ -774,7 +774,7 @@ int radeon_device_init(struct radeon_device *rdev, if (rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_AGP) rdev->need_dma32 = true; if ((rdev->flags & RADEON_IS_PCI) &&
(rdev->family < CHIP_RS400))
(rdev->family <= CHIP_RS740)) rdev->need_dma32 = true; dma_bits = rdev->need_dma32 ? 32 : 40;-- 1.7.11.2
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:56:27AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:50 PM, j.glisse@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jerome Glisse jglisse@redhat.com
It seems some of those IGP dislike non dma32 page despite what documentation says. Fix regression since we allowed non dma32 pages. It seems it only affect some revision of those IGP chips as we don't know which one just force dma32 for all of them.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785375
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse jglisse@redhat.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This is upstream commit 4a2b6662c3632176b4fdf012243dd3751367bf1f. I don't see it queued up in the stable-queue, so I thought I'd point it out in case it was missed.
I am way behind on the drm patches for stable, I have a ton of them in my todo-queue, but have been traveling all week at a conference and haven't had the chance to get to them. Hopefully I'll be able to flush them all out next week, but don't worry, it's not lost.
thanks,
greg k-h
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 04:00:51PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 08:56:27AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 4:50 PM, j.glisse@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jerome Glisse jglisse@redhat.com
It seems some of those IGP dislike non dma32 page despite what documentation says. Fix regression since we allowed non dma32 pages. It seems it only affect some revision of those IGP chips as we don't know which one just force dma32 for all of them.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785375
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse jglisse@redhat.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This is upstream commit 4a2b6662c3632176b4fdf012243dd3751367bf1f. I don't see it queued up in the stable-queue, so I thought I'd point it out in case it was missed.
I am way behind on the drm patches for stable, I have a ton of them in my todo-queue, but have been traveling all week at a conference and haven't had the chance to get to them. Hopefully I'll be able to flush them all out next week, but don't worry, it's not lost.
It's now applied, thanks,
greg k-h
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Greg KH -
j.glisse＠gmail.com -
Josh Boyer