Hey Zhiming,

On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 16:42, Zhiming Liu lzmlzmhh@gmail.com wrote:

drm/bridge: Remove extra device acquisition method of i2c client in lt9611 driver.

The commit title is already in the email title, it doesn't need to be sent twice, sorry if I was unclear about this.

We have got the device of i2c client in probe function.So we should remove extra

This line is too long, and `checkpatch.pl --strict` complains about its length.

device acquisition method of i2c client.

Signed-off-by: Zhiming Liu lzmlzmhh@gmail.com

drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c index dafb1b47c15f..feb128a4557d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611.c @@ -1090,7 +1090,7 @@ static int lt9611_probe(struct i2c_client *client, if (!lt9611) return -ENOMEM;

•   lt9611->dev = &client->dev;
  

•   lt9611->dev = dev;
    lt9611->client = client;
    lt9611->sleep = false;
  
  

@@ -1100,7 +1100,7 @@ static int lt9611_probe(struct i2c_client *client, return PTR_ERR(lt9611->regmap); }

•   ret = lt9611_parse_dt(&client->dev, lt9611);
  

•   ret = lt9611_parse_dt(dev, lt9611);
    if (ret) {
            dev_err(dev, "failed to parse device tree\n");
            return ret;
  

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c index 33f9716da0ee..3d62e6bf6892 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/lontium-lt9611uxc.c @@ -860,7 +860,7 @@ static int lt9611uxc_probe(struct i2c_client *client, if (!lt9611uxc) return -ENOMEM;

•   lt9611uxc->dev = &client->dev;
  

•   lt9611uxc->dev = dev;
    lt9611uxc->client = client;
    mutex_init(&lt9611uxc->ocm_lock);
  
  

@@ -870,7 +870,7 @@ static int lt9611uxc_probe(struct i2c_client *client, return PTR_ERR(lt9611uxc->regmap); }

•   ret = lt9611uxc_parse_dt(&client->dev, lt9611uxc);
  

•   ret = lt9611uxc_parse_dt(dev, lt9611uxc);
    if (ret) {
            dev_err(dev, "failed to parse device tree\n");
            return ret;
  

--

I fixed the two remaining issues in your patch, but in the future I would suggest running `checkpatch.pl --strict` on every patch before emailing them out. It's very easy to miss something.

Reviewed-by: Robert Foss robert.foss@linaro.org

Applied to drm-misc-next.