Apparently only rv515 asics need the workaround added in f24d86f1a49505cdea56728b853a5d0a3f8e3d11 (drm/radeon/kms: fix resume regression for some r5xx laptops).
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34709
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexdeucher@gmail.com Cc: stable@kernel.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 6 +++++- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c index 258fa5e..d71d375 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include "atom.h" #include "atom-names.h" #include "atom-bits.h" +#include "radeon.h"
#define ATOM_COND_ABOVE 0 #define ATOM_COND_ABOVEOREQUAL 1 @@ -101,7 +102,9 @@ static void debug_print_spaces(int n) static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base, uint32_t index, uint32_t data) { + struct radeon_device *rdev = ctx->card->dev->dev_private; uint32_t temp = 0xCDCDCDCD; + while (1) switch (CU8(base)) { case ATOM_IIO_NOP: @@ -112,7 +115,8 @@ static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base, base += 3; break; case ATOM_IIO_WRITE: - (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1)); + if (rdev->family == CHIP_RV515) + (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1)); ctx->card->ioreg_write(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1), temp); base += 3; break;
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeucher@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently only rv515 asics need the workaround added in f24d86f1a49505cdea56728b853a5d0a3f8e3d11 (drm/radeon/kms: fix resume regression for some r5xx laptops).
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34709
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexdeucher@gmail.com Cc: stable@kernel.org
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 6 +++++- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c index 258fa5e..d71d375 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include "atom.h" #include "atom-names.h" #include "atom-bits.h" +#include "radeon.h"
#define ATOM_COND_ABOVE 0 #define ATOM_COND_ABOVEOREQUAL 1 @@ -101,7 +102,9 @@ static void debug_print_spaces(int n) static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base, uint32_t index, uint32_t data) {
- struct radeon_device *rdev = ctx->card->dev->dev_private;
uint32_t temp = 0xCDCDCDCD;
while (1) switch (CU8(base)) { case ATOM_IIO_NOP: @@ -112,7 +115,8 @@ static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base, base += 3; break; case ATOM_IIO_WRITE:
- (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
- if (rdev->family == CHIP_RV515)
- (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
ctx->card->ioreg_write(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1), temp); base += 3; break; -- 1.7.1.1
So this patch enable io write only for one family ? This looks utterly strange.
Cheers, Jerome
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Jerome Glisse j.glisse@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeucher@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently only rv515 asics need the workaround added in f24d86f1a49505cdea56728b853a5d0a3f8e3d11 (drm/radeon/kms: fix resume regression for some r5xx laptops).
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34709
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexdeucher@gmail.com Cc: stable@kernel.org
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 6 +++++- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c index 258fa5e..d71d375 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include "atom.h" #include "atom-names.h" #include "atom-bits.h" +#include "radeon.h"
#define ATOM_COND_ABOVE 0 #define ATOM_COND_ABOVEOREQUAL 1 @@ -101,7 +102,9 @@ static void debug_print_spaces(int n) static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base, uint32_t index, uint32_t data) {
- struct radeon_device *rdev = ctx->card->dev->dev_private;
uint32_t temp = 0xCDCDCDCD;
while (1) switch (CU8(base)) { case ATOM_IIO_NOP: @@ -112,7 +115,8 @@ static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base, base += 3; break; case ATOM_IIO_WRITE:
- (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
- if (rdev->family == CHIP_RV515)
- (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
ctx->card->ioreg_write(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1), temp); base += 3; break; -- 1.7.1.1
So this patch enable io write only for one family ? This looks utterly strange.
No, it just does a read before write for rv515. I don't know why it needs it, but it seems to.
Alex
Cheers, Jerome
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Alex Deucher alexdeucher@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Jerome Glisse j.glisse@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Alex Deucher alexdeucher@gmail.com wrote:
Apparently only rv515 asics need the workaround added in f24d86f1a49505cdea56728b853a5d0a3f8e3d11 (drm/radeon/kms: fix resume regression for some r5xx laptops).
Fixes: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34709
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexdeucher@gmail.com Cc: stable@kernel.org
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 6 +++++- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c index 258fa5e..d71d375 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include "atom.h" #include "atom-names.h" #include "atom-bits.h" +#include "radeon.h"
#define ATOM_COND_ABOVE 0 #define ATOM_COND_ABOVEOREQUAL 1 @@ -101,7 +102,9 @@ static void debug_print_spaces(int n) static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base, uint32_t index, uint32_t data) {
- struct radeon_device *rdev = ctx->card->dev->dev_private;
uint32_t temp = 0xCDCDCDCD;
while (1) switch (CU8(base)) { case ATOM_IIO_NOP: @@ -112,7 +115,8 @@ static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base, base += 3; break; case ATOM_IIO_WRITE:
- (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
- if (rdev->family == CHIP_RV515)
- (void)ctx->card->ioreg_read(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1));
ctx->card->ioreg_write(ctx->card, CU16(base + 1), temp); base += 3; break; -- 1.7.1.1
So this patch enable io write only for one family ? This looks utterly strange.
No, it just does a read before write for rv515. I don't know why it needs it, but it seems to.
Yeah I really wish I knew why either,
Thinkpad T60 with X1300, no resume without this, it failed in the memory initialisation table. this was the only thing I could find to fix it.
My x1300 desktop card works fine without this.
Dave.
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org