W dniu 4 czerwca 2010 21:55 użytkownik Jerome Glisse glisse@freedesktop.org napisał:

On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:54:42PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:

...

2010/6/4 Jerome Glisse jglisse@redhat.com:

...

Instead of dumping unprocessed dwords, dump the last 64 dwords of the ring. This make debugging of some case easier.

Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse jglisse@redhat.com

drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c |    6 +++---  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c index f68cc92..1537079 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c @@ -3371,9 +3371,9 @@ static int r600_debugfs_cp_ring_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)        seq_printf(m, "driver's copy of the CP_RB_RPTR 0x%08x\n", rdev->cp.rptr);        seq_printf(m, "%u free dwords in ring\n", rdev->cp.ring_free_dw);        seq_printf(m, "%u dwords in ring\n", count);

• i = rdev->cp.rptr;
• for (j = 0; j <= count; j++) {
• seq_printf(m, "r[%04d]=0x%08x\n", i, rdev->cp.ring[i]);

• i = (rdev->cp.wptr + (rdev->cp.ring_size / 4) - 64) & rdev->cp.ptr_mask;
• for (j = 0; j <= 64; j++) {
• seq_printf(m, "r[%04d]=0x%08X\n", i, rdev->cp.ring[i]);

i = (i + 1) & rdev->cp.ptr_mask;        }        return 0; -- 1.7.0.1

What about same for r1xx-r5xx? Could you care?

-- Rafał

Yes will do the patch, sorry i was working on r6xx bug at the time i did this patch.

Thanks :)