From: Rob Clark robdclark@chromium.org
I've seen some crashes in our crash reporting that *look* like multiple threads stomping on each other while communicating with GMU. So wrap all those paths in a lock.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark robdclark@chromium.org --- Are we allowed to use c99/gnu99 yet?
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 6 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h | 9 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++------- 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile index 904535eda0c4..57283bbad3f0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 -ccflags-y := -I $(srctree)/$(src) +ccflags-y := -I $(srctree)/$(src) -std=gnu99 ccflags-y += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/disp/dpu1 ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DSI) += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/dsi ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DP) += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/dp diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c index a7c58018959f..8b73f70766a4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c @@ -296,6 +296,8 @@ int a6xx_gmu_set_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state) u32 val; int request, ack;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&gmu->lock)); + if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_gmu_oob_bits)) return -EINVAL;
@@ -337,6 +339,8 @@ void a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state) { int bit;
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&gmu->lock)); + if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_gmu_oob_bits)) return;
@@ -1482,6 +1486,8 @@ int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node) if (!pdev) return -ENODEV;
+ mutex_init(&gmu->lock); + gmu->dev = &pdev->dev;
of_dma_configure(gmu->dev, node, true); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h index 3c74f64e3126..f05a00c0afd0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ struct a6xx_gmu_bo { struct a6xx_gmu { struct device *dev;
+ /* For serializing communication with the GMU: */ + struct mutex lock; + struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace;
void * __iomem mmio; @@ -88,6 +91,12 @@ struct a6xx_gmu { bool legacy; /* a618 or a630 */ };
+/* Helper macro for serializing GMU access: */ +#define with_gmu_lock(gmu) \ + for (bool done = ({ mutex_lock(&(gmu)->lock); false; }); \ + !done; \ + done = ({ mutex_unlock(&(gmu)->lock); true; })) + static inline u32 gmu_read(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset) { return msm_readl(gmu->mmio + (offset << 2)); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c index f6a4dbef796b..5e1ae3df42ba 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static int a6xx_zap_shader_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) A6XX_RBBM_INT_0_MASK_UCHE_OOB_ACCESS | \ A6XX_RBBM_INT_0_MASK_UCHE_TRAP_INTR)
-static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) +static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) { struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu); struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu); @@ -1135,6 +1135,19 @@ static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) return ret; }
+static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) +{ + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu); + struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu); + int ret; + + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) { + ret = hw_init(gpu); + } + + return ret; +} + static void a6xx_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu) { DRM_DEV_INFO(&gpu->pdev->dev, "status: %08x\n", @@ -1509,7 +1522,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
trace_msm_gpu_resume(0);
- ret = a6xx_gmu_resume(a6xx_gpu); + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) { + ret = a6xx_gmu_resume(a6xx_gpu); + } if (ret) return ret;
@@ -1532,7 +1547,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
msm_devfreq_suspend(gpu);
- ret = a6xx_gmu_stop(a6xx_gpu); + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) { + ret = a6xx_gmu_stop(a6xx_gpu); + } if (ret) return ret;
@@ -1547,18 +1564,17 @@ static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value) { struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu); struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu); - static DEFINE_MUTEX(perfcounter_oob);
- mutex_lock(&perfcounter_oob); + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) { + /* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */ + a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
- /* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */ - a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET); + *value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_LO, + REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_HI);
- *value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_LO, - REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_HI); + a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET); + }
- a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET); - mutex_unlock(&perfcounter_oob); return 0; }
@@ -1622,6 +1638,16 @@ static unsigned long a6xx_gpu_busy(struct msm_gpu *gpu) return (unsigned long)busy_time; }
+void a6xx_gpu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct dev_pm_opp *opp) +{ + struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu); + struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu); + + with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) { + a6xx_gmu_set_freq(gpu, opp); + } +} + static struct msm_gem_address_space * a6xx_create_address_space(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct platform_device *pdev) { @@ -1766,7 +1792,7 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = { #endif .gpu_busy = a6xx_gpu_busy, .gpu_get_freq = a6xx_gmu_get_freq, - .gpu_set_freq = a6xx_gmu_set_freq, + .gpu_set_freq = a6xx_gpu_set_freq, #if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE) .gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get, .gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,
On 27/09/2021 21:03, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark robdclark@chromium.org
I've seen some crashes in our crash reporting that *look* like multiple threads stomping on each other while communicating with GMU. So wrap all those paths in a lock.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark robdclark@chromium.org
Are we allowed to use c99/gnu99 yet?
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 6 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h | 9 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++------- 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile index 904535eda0c4..57283bbad3f0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 -ccflags-y := -I $(srctree)/$(src) +ccflags-y := -I $(srctree)/$(src) -std=gnu99 ccflags-y += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/disp/dpu1 ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DSI) += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/dsi ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DP) += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/dp diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c index a7c58018959f..8b73f70766a4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c @@ -296,6 +296,8 @@ int a6xx_gmu_set_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state) u32 val; int request, ack;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&gmu->lock));
- if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_gmu_oob_bits)) return -EINVAL;
@@ -337,6 +339,8 @@ void a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state) { int bit;
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&gmu->lock));
- if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_gmu_oob_bits)) return;
@@ -1482,6 +1486,8 @@ int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node) if (!pdev) return -ENODEV;
mutex_init(&gmu->lock);
gmu->dev = &pdev->dev;
of_dma_configure(gmu->dev, node, true);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h index 3c74f64e3126..f05a00c0afd0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ struct a6xx_gmu_bo { struct a6xx_gmu { struct device *dev;
/* For serializing communication with the GMU: */
struct mutex lock;
struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace;
void * __iomem mmio;
@@ -88,6 +91,12 @@ struct a6xx_gmu { bool legacy; /* a618 or a630 */ };
+/* Helper macro for serializing GMU access: */ +#define with_gmu_lock(gmu) \
- for (bool done = ({ mutex_lock(&(gmu)->lock); false; }); \
!done; \
done = ({ mutex_unlock(&(gmu)->lock); true; }))
The intent is good, but I'm not sure this kind of syntax sugar would be a good approach. What about calling lock/unlock explicitly, like we typically do? Then we won't have to use c99.
- static inline u32 gmu_read(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset) { return msm_readl(gmu->mmio + (offset << 2));
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c index f6a4dbef796b..5e1ae3df42ba 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static int a6xx_zap_shader_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) A6XX_RBBM_INT_0_MASK_UCHE_OOB_ACCESS | \ A6XX_RBBM_INT_0_MASK_UCHE_TRAP_INTR)
-static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) +static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) { struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu); struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu); @@ -1135,6 +1135,19 @@ static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) return ret; }
+static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) +{
- struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
- struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
- int ret;
- with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
ret = hw_init(gpu);
- }
- return ret;
+}
- static void a6xx_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu) { DRM_DEV_INFO(&gpu->pdev->dev, "status: %08x\n",
@@ -1509,7 +1522,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
trace_msm_gpu_resume(0);
- ret = a6xx_gmu_resume(a6xx_gpu);
- with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
ret = a6xx_gmu_resume(a6xx_gpu);
- } if (ret) return ret;
@@ -1532,7 +1547,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
msm_devfreq_suspend(gpu);
- ret = a6xx_gmu_stop(a6xx_gpu);
- with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
ret = a6xx_gmu_stop(a6xx_gpu);
- } if (ret) return ret;
@@ -1547,18 +1564,17 @@ static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value) { struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu); struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(perfcounter_oob);
mutex_lock(&perfcounter_oob);
- with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
/* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */
a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
- /* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */
- a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
*value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_LO,
REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_HI);
- *value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_LO,
REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_HI);
a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
- }
- a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
- mutex_unlock(&perfcounter_oob); return 0; }
@@ -1622,6 +1638,16 @@ static unsigned long a6xx_gpu_busy(struct msm_gpu *gpu) return (unsigned long)busy_time; }
+void a6xx_gpu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct dev_pm_opp *opp) +{
- struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
- struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
- with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
a6xx_gmu_set_freq(gpu, opp);
- }
+}
- static struct msm_gem_address_space * a6xx_create_address_space(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct platform_device *pdev) {
@@ -1766,7 +1792,7 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = { #endif .gpu_busy = a6xx_gpu_busy, .gpu_get_freq = a6xx_gmu_get_freq,
.gpu_set_freq = a6xx_gmu_set_freq,
#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE) .gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get, .gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,.gpu_set_freq = a6xx_gpu_set_freq,
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:39 AM Dmitry Baryshkov dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org wrote:
On 27/09/2021 21:03, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark robdclark@chromium.org
I've seen some crashes in our crash reporting that *look* like multiple threads stomping on each other while communicating with GMU. So wrap all those paths in a lock.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark robdclark@chromium.org
Are we allowed to use c99/gnu99 yet?
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 6 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h | 9 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++------- 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile index 904535eda0c4..57283bbad3f0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 -ccflags-y := -I $(srctree)/$(src) +ccflags-y := -I $(srctree)/$(src) -std=gnu99 ccflags-y += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/disp/dpu1 ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DSI) += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/dsi ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DP) += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/dp diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c index a7c58018959f..8b73f70766a4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c @@ -296,6 +296,8 @@ int a6xx_gmu_set_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state) u32 val; int request, ack;
WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&gmu->lock));
if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_gmu_oob_bits)) return -EINVAL;
@@ -337,6 +339,8 @@ void a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state) { int bit;
WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&gmu->lock));
if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_gmu_oob_bits)) return;
@@ -1482,6 +1486,8 @@ int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node) if (!pdev) return -ENODEV;
mutex_init(&gmu->lock);
gmu->dev = &pdev->dev; of_dma_configure(gmu->dev, node, true);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h index 3c74f64e3126..f05a00c0afd0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ struct a6xx_gmu_bo { struct a6xx_gmu { struct device *dev;
/* For serializing communication with the GMU: */
struct mutex lock;
struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace; void * __iomem mmio;
@@ -88,6 +91,12 @@ struct a6xx_gmu { bool legacy; /* a618 or a630 */ };
+/* Helper macro for serializing GMU access: */ +#define with_gmu_lock(gmu) \
for (bool done = ({ mutex_lock(&(gmu)->lock); false; }); \
!done; \
done = ({ mutex_unlock(&(gmu)->lock); true; }))
The intent is good, but I'm not sure this kind of syntax sugar would be a good approach. What about calling lock/unlock explicitly, like we typically do? Then we won't have to use c99.
Yeah, I was planning to resend without the sugar.. but it was a good excuse to bring up c99. Ie. I want c99 regardless ;-)
(The sugar was useful initially before I'd sorted thru all the code paths and settled on using a mutex vs spinlock)
BR, -R
- static inline u32 gmu_read(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset) { return msm_readl(gmu->mmio + (offset << 2));
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c index f6a4dbef796b..5e1ae3df42ba 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static int a6xx_zap_shader_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) A6XX_RBBM_INT_0_MASK_UCHE_OOB_ACCESS | \ A6XX_RBBM_INT_0_MASK_UCHE_TRAP_INTR)
-static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) +static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) { struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu); struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu); @@ -1135,6 +1135,19 @@ static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) return ret; }
+static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) +{
struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
int ret;
with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
ret = hw_init(gpu);
}
return ret;
+}
- static void a6xx_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu) { DRM_DEV_INFO(&gpu->pdev->dev, "status: %08x\n",
@@ -1509,7 +1522,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
trace_msm_gpu_resume(0);
ret = a6xx_gmu_resume(a6xx_gpu);
with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
ret = a6xx_gmu_resume(a6xx_gpu);
} if (ret) return ret;
@@ -1532,7 +1547,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
msm_devfreq_suspend(gpu);
ret = a6xx_gmu_stop(a6xx_gpu);
with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
ret = a6xx_gmu_stop(a6xx_gpu);
} if (ret) return ret;
@@ -1547,18 +1564,17 @@ static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value) { struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu); struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(perfcounter_oob);
mutex_lock(&perfcounter_oob);
with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
/* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */
a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
/* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */
a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
*value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_LO,
REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_HI);
*value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_LO,
REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_HI);
a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
}
a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
}mutex_unlock(&perfcounter_oob); return 0;
@@ -1622,6 +1638,16 @@ static unsigned long a6xx_gpu_busy(struct msm_gpu *gpu) return (unsigned long)busy_time; }
+void a6xx_gpu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct dev_pm_opp *opp) +{
struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
a6xx_gmu_set_freq(gpu, opp);
}
+}
- static struct msm_gem_address_space * a6xx_create_address_space(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct platform_device *pdev) {
@@ -1766,7 +1792,7 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = { #endif .gpu_busy = a6xx_gpu_busy, .gpu_get_freq = a6xx_gmu_get_freq,
.gpu_set_freq = a6xx_gmu_set_freq,
#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE) .gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get, .gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,.gpu_set_freq = a6xx_gpu_set_freq,
-- With best wishes Dmitry
On 01/10/2021 21:05, Rob Clark wrote:
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 10:39 AM Dmitry Baryshkov dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org wrote:
On 27/09/2021 21:03, Rob Clark wrote:
From: Rob Clark robdclark@chromium.org
I've seen some crashes in our crash reporting that *look* like multiple threads stomping on each other while communicating with GMU. So wrap all those paths in a lock.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark robdclark@chromium.org
Are we allowed to use c99/gnu99 yet?
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 6 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h | 9 +++++ drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++------- 4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile index 904535eda0c4..57283bbad3f0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/Makefile @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 -ccflags-y := -I $(srctree)/$(src) +ccflags-y := -I $(srctree)/$(src) -std=gnu99 ccflags-y += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/disp/dpu1 ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DSI) += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/dsi ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_DP) += -I $(srctree)/$(src)/dp diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c index a7c58018959f..8b73f70766a4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c @@ -296,6 +296,8 @@ int a6xx_gmu_set_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state) u32 val; int request, ack;
WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&gmu->lock));
if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_gmu_oob_bits)) return -EINVAL;
@@ -337,6 +339,8 @@ void a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, enum a6xx_gmu_oob_state state) { int bit;
WARN_ON_ONCE(!mutex_is_locked(&gmu->lock));
if (state >= ARRAY_SIZE(a6xx_gmu_oob_bits)) return;
@@ -1482,6 +1486,8 @@ int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node) if (!pdev) return -ENODEV;
mutex_init(&gmu->lock);
gmu->dev = &pdev->dev; of_dma_configure(gmu->dev, node, true);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h index 3c74f64e3126..f05a00c0afd0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.h @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ struct a6xx_gmu_bo { struct a6xx_gmu { struct device *dev;
/* For serializing communication with the GMU: */
struct mutex lock;
struct msm_gem_address_space *aspace; void * __iomem mmio;
@@ -88,6 +91,12 @@ struct a6xx_gmu { bool legacy; /* a618 or a630 */ };
+/* Helper macro for serializing GMU access: */ +#define with_gmu_lock(gmu) \
for (bool done = ({ mutex_lock(&(gmu)->lock); false; }); \
!done; \
done = ({ mutex_unlock(&(gmu)->lock); true; }))
The intent is good, but I'm not sure this kind of syntax sugar would be a good approach. What about calling lock/unlock explicitly, like we typically do? Then we won't have to use c99.
Yeah, I was planning to resend without the sugar.. but it was a good excuse to bring up c99. Ie. I want c99 regardless ;-)
(The sugar was useful initially before I'd sorted thru all the code paths and settled on using a mutex vs spinlock)
We can always have GMU_LOCK/GMU_UNLOCK macros.
BR, -R
- static inline u32 gmu_read(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu, u32 offset) { return msm_readl(gmu->mmio + (offset << 2));
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c index f6a4dbef796b..5e1ae3df42ba 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gpu.c @@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ static int a6xx_zap_shader_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) A6XX_RBBM_INT_0_MASK_UCHE_OOB_ACCESS | \ A6XX_RBBM_INT_0_MASK_UCHE_TRAP_INTR)
-static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) +static int hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) { struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu); struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu); @@ -1135,6 +1135,19 @@ static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) return ret; }
+static int a6xx_hw_init(struct msm_gpu *gpu) +{
struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
int ret;
with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
ret = hw_init(gpu);
}
return ret;
+}
- static void a6xx_dump(struct msm_gpu *gpu) { DRM_DEV_INFO(&gpu->pdev->dev, "status: %08x\n",
@@ -1509,7 +1522,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_resume(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
trace_msm_gpu_resume(0);
ret = a6xx_gmu_resume(a6xx_gpu);
with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
ret = a6xx_gmu_resume(a6xx_gpu);
} if (ret) return ret;
@@ -1532,7 +1547,9 @@ static int a6xx_pm_suspend(struct msm_gpu *gpu)
msm_devfreq_suspend(gpu);
ret = a6xx_gmu_stop(a6xx_gpu);
with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
ret = a6xx_gmu_stop(a6xx_gpu);
} if (ret) return ret;
@@ -1547,18 +1564,17 @@ static int a6xx_get_timestamp(struct msm_gpu *gpu, uint64_t *value) { struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu); struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
static DEFINE_MUTEX(perfcounter_oob);
mutex_lock(&perfcounter_oob);
with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
/* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */
a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
/* Force the GPU power on so we can read this register */
a6xx_gmu_set_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
*value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_LO,
REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_HI);
*value = gpu_read64(gpu, REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_LO,
REG_A6XX_CP_ALWAYS_ON_COUNTER_HI);
a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
}
a6xx_gmu_clear_oob(&a6xx_gpu->gmu, GMU_OOB_PERFCOUNTER_SET);
}mutex_unlock(&perfcounter_oob); return 0;
@@ -1622,6 +1638,16 @@ static unsigned long a6xx_gpu_busy(struct msm_gpu *gpu) return (unsigned long)busy_time; }
+void a6xx_gpu_set_freq(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct dev_pm_opp *opp) +{
struct adreno_gpu *adreno_gpu = to_adreno_gpu(gpu);
struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu = to_a6xx_gpu(adreno_gpu);
with_gmu_lock(&a6xx_gpu->gmu) {
a6xx_gmu_set_freq(gpu, opp);
}
+}
- static struct msm_gem_address_space * a6xx_create_address_space(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct platform_device *pdev) {
@@ -1766,7 +1792,7 @@ static const struct adreno_gpu_funcs funcs = { #endif .gpu_busy = a6xx_gpu_busy, .gpu_get_freq = a6xx_gmu_get_freq,
.gpu_set_freq = a6xx_gmu_set_freq,
#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_MSM_GPU_STATE) .gpu_state_get = a6xx_gpu_state_get, .gpu_state_put = a6xx_gpu_state_put,.gpu_set_freq = a6xx_gpu_set_freq,
-- With best wishes Dmitry
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org