Hello!
Some misc fixes. Patches are rebased on top of Gustavo's cleanup series: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg43380.html
With best wishes, Tobias
Use the correct spelling for 'progressive'.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c index 3511fcc..20e2ce7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c @@ -2022,7 +2022,7 @@ static void hdmi_mode_set(struct exynos_drm_display *display, DRM_DEBUG_KMS("xres=%d, yres=%d, refresh=%d, intl=%s\n", m->hdisplay, m->vdisplay, m->vrefresh, (m->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) ? - "INTERLACED" : "PROGERESSIVE"); + "INTERLACED" : "PROGRESSIVE");
/* preserve mode information for later use. */ drm_mode_copy(&hdata->current_mode, mode); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c index aa5b6e1..5ab0e32 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static void mixer_cfg_scan(struct mixer_context *ctx, unsigned int height)
/* choosing between interlace and progressive mode */ val = (ctx->interlace ? MXR_CFG_SCAN_INTERLACE : - MXR_CFG_SCAN_PROGRASSIVE); + MXR_CFG_SCAN_PROGRESSIVE);
if (ctx->mxr_ver != MXR_VER_128_0_0_184) { /* choosing between proper HD and SD mode */ diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h index 5f32e1a..ac60260 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ #define MXR_CFG_GRP0_ENABLE (1 << 4) #define MXR_CFG_VP_ENABLE (1 << 3) #define MXR_CFG_SCAN_INTERLACE (0 << 2) -#define MXR_CFG_SCAN_PROGRASSIVE (1 << 2) +#define MXR_CFG_SCAN_PROGRESSIVE (1 << 2) #define MXR_CFG_SCAN_NTSC (0 << 1) #define MXR_CFG_SCAN_PAL (1 << 1) #define MXR_CFG_SCAN_SD (0 << 0)
Hi,
On 04/07/2015 08:14 AM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
Use the correct spelling for 'progressive'.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c index 3511fcc..20e2ce7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c @@ -2022,7 +2022,7 @@ static void hdmi_mode_set(struct exynos_drm_display *display, DRM_DEBUG_KMS("xres=%d, yres=%d, refresh=%d, intl=%s\n", m->hdisplay, m->vdisplay, m->vrefresh, (m->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) ?
"INTERLACED" : "PROGERESSIVE");
"INTERLACED" : "PROGRESSIVE");
/* preserve mode information for later use. */ drm_mode_copy(&hdata->current_mode, mode);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c index aa5b6e1..5ab0e32 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static void mixer_cfg_scan(struct mixer_context *ctx, unsigned int height)
/* choosing between interlace and progressive mode */ val = (ctx->interlace ? MXR_CFG_SCAN_INTERLACE :
MXR_CFG_SCAN_PROGRASSIVE);
MXR_CFG_SCAN_PROGRESSIVE);
if (ctx->mxr_ver != MXR_VER_128_0_0_184) { /* choosing between proper HD and SD mode */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h index 5f32e1a..ac60260 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ #define MXR_CFG_GRP0_ENABLE (1 << 4) #define MXR_CFG_VP_ENABLE (1 << 3) #define MXR_CFG_SCAN_INTERLACE (0 << 2) -#define MXR_CFG_SCAN_PROGRASSIVE (1 << 2) +#define MXR_CFG_SCAN_PROGRESSIVE (1 << 2) #define MXR_CFG_SCAN_NTSC (0 << 1) #define MXR_CFG_SCAN_PAL (1 << 1) #define MXR_CFG_SCAN_SD (0 << 0)
Acked-by: Joonyoung Shim jy0922.shim@samsung.com
Thanks.
On 2015년 04월 07일 08:14, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
Use the correct spelling for 'progressive'.
1 through 3, Applied.
Thanks, Inki Dae
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c index 3511fcc..20e2ce7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_hdmi.c @@ -2022,7 +2022,7 @@ static void hdmi_mode_set(struct exynos_drm_display *display, DRM_DEBUG_KMS("xres=%d, yres=%d, refresh=%d, intl=%s\n", m->hdisplay, m->vdisplay, m->vrefresh, (m->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_INTERLACE) ?
"INTERLACED" : "PROGERESSIVE");
"INTERLACED" : "PROGRESSIVE");
/* preserve mode information for later use. */ drm_mode_copy(&hdata->current_mode, mode);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c index aa5b6e1..5ab0e32 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ static void mixer_cfg_scan(struct mixer_context *ctx, unsigned int height)
/* choosing between interlace and progressive mode */ val = (ctx->interlace ? MXR_CFG_SCAN_INTERLACE :
MXR_CFG_SCAN_PROGRASSIVE);
MXR_CFG_SCAN_PROGRESSIVE);
if (ctx->mxr_ver != MXR_VER_128_0_0_184) { /* choosing between proper HD and SD mode */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h index 5f32e1a..ac60260 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/regs-mixer.h @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ #define MXR_CFG_GRP0_ENABLE (1 << 4) #define MXR_CFG_VP_ENABLE (1 << 3) #define MXR_CFG_SCAN_INTERLACE (0 << 2) -#define MXR_CFG_SCAN_PROGRASSIVE (1 << 2) +#define MXR_CFG_SCAN_PROGRESSIVE (1 << 2) #define MXR_CFG_SCAN_NTSC (0 << 1) #define MXR_CFG_SCAN_PAL (1 << 1) #define MXR_CFG_SCAN_SD (0 << 0)
The messages are redundant since 'check_fb_gem_memory_type' already prints out exactly the same string when it fails.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c index d346d1e..929cb03 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c @@ -151,10 +151,8 @@ exynos_drm_framebuffer_init(struct drm_device *dev, exynos_gem_obj = to_exynos_gem_obj(obj);
ret = check_fb_gem_memory_type(dev, exynos_gem_obj); - if (ret < 0) { - DRM_ERROR("cannot use this gem memory type for fb.\n"); - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL); - } + if (ret < 0) + return ERR_PTR(ret);
exynos_fb = kzalloc(sizeof(*exynos_fb), GFP_KERNEL); if (!exynos_fb) @@ -250,10 +248,8 @@ exynos_user_fb_create(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv, exynos_fb->exynos_gem_obj[i] = exynos_gem_obj;
ret = check_fb_gem_memory_type(dev, exynos_gem_obj); - if (ret < 0) { - DRM_ERROR("cannot use this gem memory type for fb.\n"); + if (ret < 0) goto err_unreference; - } }
ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &exynos_fb->fb, &exynos_drm_fb_funcs);
Hi,
On 04/07/2015 08:14 AM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
The messages are redundant since 'check_fb_gem_memory_type' already prints out exactly the same string when it fails.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c index d346d1e..929cb03 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_fb.c @@ -151,10 +151,8 @@ exynos_drm_framebuffer_init(struct drm_device *dev, exynos_gem_obj = to_exynos_gem_obj(obj);
ret = check_fb_gem_memory_type(dev, exynos_gem_obj);
- if (ret < 0) {
DRM_ERROR("cannot use this gem memory type for fb.\n");
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
- }
if (ret < 0)
return ERR_PTR(ret);
exynos_fb = kzalloc(sizeof(*exynos_fb), GFP_KERNEL); if (!exynos_fb)
@@ -250,10 +248,8 @@ exynos_user_fb_create(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file_priv, exynos_fb->exynos_gem_obj[i] = exynos_gem_obj;
ret = check_fb_gem_memory_type(dev, exynos_gem_obj);
if (ret < 0) {
DRM_ERROR("cannot use this gem memory type for fb.\n");
if (ret < 0) goto err_unreference;
}
}
ret = drm_framebuffer_init(dev, &exynos_fb->fb, &exynos_drm_fb_funcs);
Acked-by: Joonyoung Shim jy0922.shim@samsung.com
Thanks.
While the VP (video processor) supports arbitrary scaling of its input, the mixer just supports a simple 2x (line doubling) scaling. Expose this functionality and exit early when an unsupported scaling configuration is encountered.
This was tested with modetest's DRM plane test (from the libdrm test suite) on an Odroid-X2 (Exynos4412).
v2: Put if- and return-statement on different lines.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c index 5ab0e32..f51011e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c @@ -499,12 +499,36 @@ static void mixer_layer_update(struct mixer_context *ctx) mixer_reg_writemask(res, MXR_CFG, ~0, MXR_CFG_LAYER_UPDATE); }
+static int mixer_setup_scale(const struct exynos_drm_plane *plane, + unsigned int *x_ratio, unsigned int *y_ratio) +{ + if (plane->crtc_width != plane->src_width) { + if (plane->crtc_width == 2 * plane->src_width) + *x_ratio = 1; + else + goto fail; + } + + if (plane->crtc_height != plane->src_height) { + if (plane->crtc_height == 2 * plane->src_height) + *y_ratio = 1; + else + goto fail; + } + + return 0; + +fail: + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("only 2x width/height scaling of plane supported\n"); + return -ENOTSUPP; +} + static void mixer_graph_buffer(struct mixer_context *ctx, int win) { struct mixer_resources *res = &ctx->mixer_res; unsigned long flags; struct exynos_drm_plane *plane; - unsigned int x_ratio, y_ratio; + unsigned int x_ratio = 0, y_ratio = 0; unsigned int src_x_offset, src_y_offset, dst_x_offset, dst_y_offset; dma_addr_t dma_addr; unsigned int fmt; @@ -528,9 +552,9 @@ static void mixer_graph_buffer(struct mixer_context *ctx, int win) fmt = ARGB8888; }
- /* 2x scaling feature */ - x_ratio = 0; - y_ratio = 0; + /* check if mixer supports requested scaling setup */ + if (mixer_setup_scale(plane, &x_ratio, &y_ratio)) + return;
dst_x_offset = plane->crtc_x; dst_y_offset = plane->crtc_y; @@ -566,8 +590,8 @@ static void mixer_graph_buffer(struct mixer_context *ctx, int win) mixer_reg_write(res, MXR_RESOLUTION, val); }
- val = MXR_GRP_WH_WIDTH(plane->crtc_width); - val |= MXR_GRP_WH_HEIGHT(plane->crtc_height); + val = MXR_GRP_WH_WIDTH(plane->src_width); + val |= MXR_GRP_WH_HEIGHT(plane->src_height); val |= MXR_GRP_WH_H_SCALE(x_ratio); val |= MXR_GRP_WH_V_SCALE(y_ratio); mixer_reg_write(res, MXR_GRAPHIC_WH(win), val);
Hi,
On 04/07/2015 08:14 AM, Tobias Jakobi wrote:
While the VP (video processor) supports arbitrary scaling of its input, the mixer just supports a simple 2x (line doubling) scaling. Expose this functionality and exit early when an unsupported scaling configuration is encountered.
This was tested with modetest's DRM plane test (from the libdrm test suite) on an Odroid-X2 (Exynos4412).
v2: Put if- and return-statement on different lines.
Reviewed-by: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk Signed-off-by: Tobias Jakobi tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c index 5ab0e32..f51011e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_mixer.c @@ -499,12 +499,36 @@ static void mixer_layer_update(struct mixer_context *ctx) mixer_reg_writemask(res, MXR_CFG, ~0, MXR_CFG_LAYER_UPDATE); }
+static int mixer_setup_scale(const struct exynos_drm_plane *plane,
unsigned int *x_ratio, unsigned int *y_ratio)
+{
- if (plane->crtc_width != plane->src_width) {
if (plane->crtc_width == 2 * plane->src_width)
*x_ratio = 1;
else
goto fail;
- }
- if (plane->crtc_height != plane->src_height) {
if (plane->crtc_height == 2 * plane->src_height)
*y_ratio = 1;
else
goto fail;
- }
- return 0;
+fail:
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("only 2x width/height scaling of plane supported\n");
- return -ENOTSUPP;
+}
static void mixer_graph_buffer(struct mixer_context *ctx, int win) { struct mixer_resources *res = &ctx->mixer_res; unsigned long flags; struct exynos_drm_plane *plane;
- unsigned int x_ratio, y_ratio;
- unsigned int x_ratio = 0, y_ratio = 0; unsigned int src_x_offset, src_y_offset, dst_x_offset, dst_y_offset; dma_addr_t dma_addr; unsigned int fmt;
@@ -528,9 +552,9 @@ static void mixer_graph_buffer(struct mixer_context *ctx, int win) fmt = ARGB8888; }
- /* 2x scaling feature */
- x_ratio = 0;
- y_ratio = 0;
/* check if mixer supports requested scaling setup */
if (mixer_setup_scale(plane, &x_ratio, &y_ratio))
return;
dst_x_offset = plane->crtc_x; dst_y_offset = plane->crtc_y;
@@ -566,8 +590,8 @@ static void mixer_graph_buffer(struct mixer_context *ctx, int win) mixer_reg_write(res, MXR_RESOLUTION, val); }
- val = MXR_GRP_WH_WIDTH(plane->crtc_width);
- val |= MXR_GRP_WH_HEIGHT(plane->crtc_height);
- val = MXR_GRP_WH_WIDTH(plane->src_width);
- val |= MXR_GRP_WH_HEIGHT(plane->src_height);
With this changes, i got errors when crtc gets out bound of actual screen area. I sent patch to fix it and to calculate ratio from exynos_drm plane codes.
Acked-by: Joonyoung Shim jy0922.shim@samsung.com
Thanks.
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org