In order to allow drivers to pack their privates and drm_device into one struct (e.g. for subclassing), export the initialisation routines for struct drm_device.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- include/drm/drmP.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c index bff89226a344..ceb85e611a07 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c @@ -549,11 +549,12 @@ static void drm_fs_inode_free(struct inode *inode) }
/** - * drm_dev_alloc - Allocate new DRM device - * @driver: DRM driver to allocate device for + * drm_dev_init - Initialise new DRM device + * @dev: DRM device + * @driver: DRM driver * @parent: Parent device object * - * Allocate and initialize a new DRM device. No device registration is done. + * Initialize a new DRM device. No device registration is done. * Call drm_dev_register() to advertice the device to user space and register it * with other core subsystems. This should be done last in the device * initialization sequence to make sure userspace can't access an inconsistent @@ -565,18 +566,14 @@ static void drm_fs_inode_free(struct inode *inode) * Note that for purely virtual devices @parent can be NULL. * * RETURNS: - * Pointer to new DRM device, or NULL if out of memory. + * 0 on success, or error code on failure. */ -struct drm_device *drm_dev_alloc(struct drm_driver *driver, - struct device *parent) +int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev, + struct drm_driver *driver, + struct device *parent) { - struct drm_device *dev; int ret;
- dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); - if (!dev) - return NULL; - kref_init(&dev->ref); dev->dev = parent; dev->driver = driver; @@ -638,7 +635,7 @@ struct drm_device *drm_dev_alloc(struct drm_driver *driver, goto err_setunique; }
- return dev; + return 0;
err_setunique: if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_GEM)) @@ -653,8 +650,46 @@ err_minors: drm_fs_inode_free(dev->anon_inode); err_free: mutex_destroy(&dev->master_mutex); - kfree(dev); - return NULL; + return 0; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_init); + +/** + * drm_dev_alloc - Allocate new DRM device + * @driver: DRM driver to allocate device for + * @parent: Parent device object + * + * Allocate and initialize a new DRM device. No device registration is done. + * Call drm_dev_register() to advertice the device to user space and register it + * with other core subsystems. This should be done last in the device + * initialization sequence to make sure userspace can't access an inconsistent + * state. + * + * The initial ref-count of the object is 1. Use drm_dev_ref() and + * drm_dev_unref() to take and drop further ref-counts. + * + * Note that for purely virtual devices @parent can be NULL. + * + * RETURNS: + * Pointer to new DRM device, or NULL if out of memory. + */ +struct drm_device *drm_dev_alloc(struct drm_driver *driver, + struct device *parent) +{ + struct drm_device *dev; + int ret; + + dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!dev) + return NULL; + + ret = drm_dev_init(dev, driver, parent); + if (ret) { + kfree(dev); + return NULL; + } + + return dev; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_alloc);
diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h index c5d29505f937..12dc5f9cad89 100644 --- a/include/drm/drmP.h +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h @@ -1075,6 +1075,9 @@ extern void drm_sysfs_hotplug_event(struct drm_device *dev);
struct drm_device *drm_dev_alloc(struct drm_driver *driver, struct device *parent); +int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev, + struct drm_driver *driver, + struct device *parent); void drm_dev_ref(struct drm_device *dev); void drm_dev_unref(struct drm_device *dev); int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags);
Hi, Chris
See comment below
BR Nils On 27 May 2016 7:01 a.m., "Chris Wilson" chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
In order to allow drivers to pack their privates and drm_device into one struct (e.g. for subclassing), export the initialisation routines for struct drm_device.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c | 63
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/drm/drmP.h | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c index bff89226a344..ceb85e611a07 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_drv.c @@ -549,11 +549,12 @@ static void drm_fs_inode_free(struct inode *inode) }
/**
- drm_dev_alloc - Allocate new DRM device
- @driver: DRM driver to allocate device for
- drm_dev_init - Initialise new DRM device
- @dev: DRM device
- @driver: DRM driver
- @parent: Parent device object
- Allocate and initialize a new DRM device. No device registration is
done.
- Initialize a new DRM device. No device registration is done.
- Call drm_dev_register() to advertice the device to user space and
register it
- with other core subsystems. This should be done last in the device
- initialization sequence to make sure userspace can't access an
inconsistent
@@ -565,18 +566,14 @@ static void drm_fs_inode_free(struct inode *inode)
- Note that for purely virtual devices @parent can be NULL.
- RETURNS:
- Pointer to new DRM device, or NULL if out of memory.
*/
- 0 on success, or error code on failure.
-struct drm_device *drm_dev_alloc(struct drm_driver *driver,
struct device *parent)
+int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_driver *driver,
struct device *parent)
{
struct drm_device *dev; int ret;
dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dev)
return NULL;
kref_init(&dev->ref); dev->dev = parent; dev->driver = driver;
@@ -638,7 +635,7 @@ struct drm_device *drm_dev_alloc(struct drm_driver
*driver,
goto err_setunique; }
return dev;
return 0;
err_setunique: if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_GEM)) @@ -653,8 +650,46 @@ err_minors: drm_fs_inode_free(dev->anon_inode); err_free: mutex_destroy(&dev->master_mutex);
kfree(dev);
return NULL;
return 0;
Shouldn't this return != 0?
+} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_init);
+/**
- drm_dev_alloc - Allocate new DRM device
- @driver: DRM driver to allocate device for
- @parent: Parent device object
- Allocate and initialize a new DRM device. No device registration is
done.
- Call drm_dev_register() to advertice the device to user space and
register it
- with other core subsystems. This should be done last in the device
- initialization sequence to make sure userspace can't access an
inconsistent
- state.
- The initial ref-count of the object is 1. Use drm_dev_ref() and
- drm_dev_unref() to take and drop further ref-counts.
- Note that for purely virtual devices @parent can be NULL.
- RETURNS:
- Pointer to new DRM device, or NULL if out of memory.
- */
+struct drm_device *drm_dev_alloc(struct drm_driver *driver,
struct device *parent)
+{
struct drm_device *dev;
int ret;
dev = kzalloc(sizeof(*dev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!dev)
return NULL;
ret = drm_dev_init(dev, driver, parent);
if (ret) {
kfree(dev);
return NULL;
}
return dev;
} EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dev_alloc);
diff --git a/include/drm/drmP.h b/include/drm/drmP.h index c5d29505f937..12dc5f9cad89 100644 --- a/include/drm/drmP.h +++ b/include/drm/drmP.h @@ -1075,6 +1075,9 @@ extern void drm_sysfs_hotplug_event(struct
drm_device *dev);
struct drm_device *drm_dev_alloc(struct drm_driver *driver, struct device *parent); +int drm_dev_init(struct drm_device *dev,
struct drm_driver *driver,
struct device *parent);
void drm_dev_ref(struct drm_device *dev); void drm_dev_unref(struct drm_device *dev); int drm_dev_register(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long flags); -- 2.8.1
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 05:29:43PM +0200, Nils Wallménius wrote:
Hi, Chris
See comment below
err_setunique: if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_GEM)) @@ -653,8 +650,46 @@ err_minors: drm_fs_inode_free(dev->anon_inode); err_free: mutex_destroy(&dev->master_mutex); - kfree(dev); - return NULL; + return 0;
Shouldn't this return != 0?
You saw nothing, it always said return ret! -Chris
On 27 May 2016 at 16:36, Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 05:29:43PM +0200, Nils Wallménius wrote:
Hi, Chris
See comment below
err_setunique: if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_GEM)) @@ -653,8 +650,46 @@ err_minors: drm_fs_inode_free(dev->anon_inode); err_free: mutex_destroy(&dev->master_mutex);
kfree(dev);
return NULL;
return 0;
Shouldn't this return != 0?
You saw nothing, it always said return ret!
Chris can you please elaborate ? I believe Nils has a point here.
Afact the error path of _init should return != 0, plus you already handle that case in _alloc, yet the function always returns 0.
Regards, Emil
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 04:54:46PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 27 May 2016 at 16:36, Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 05:29:43PM +0200, Nils Wallménius wrote:
Hi, Chris
See comment below
err_setunique: if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_GEM)) @@ -653,8 +650,46 @@ err_minors: drm_fs_inode_free(dev->anon_inode); err_free: mutex_destroy(&dev->master_mutex);
kfree(dev);
return NULL;
return 0;
Shouldn't this return != 0?
You saw nothing, it always said return ret!
Chris can you please elaborate ? I believe Nils has a point here.
I mean, "thanks for bringing that to my attention, oops it was meant to say return ret ofc, fixed". -Chris
On 27 May 2016 at 17:08, Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 04:54:46PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 27 May 2016 at 16:36, Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 05:29:43PM +0200, Nils Wallménius wrote:
Hi, Chris
See comment below
err_setunique: if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_GEM)) @@ -653,8 +650,46 @@ err_minors: drm_fs_inode_free(dev->anon_inode); err_free: mutex_destroy(&dev->master_mutex);
kfree(dev);
return NULL;
return 0;
Shouldn't this return != 0?
You saw nothing, it always said return ret!
Chris can you please elaborate ? I believe Nils has a point here.
I mean, "thanks for bringing that to my attention, oops it was meant to say return ret ofc, fixed".
Seems like I had a dull moment. Thanks for explaining !
-Emil
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org