Signed-off-by: Guo Yejun yejun.guo@intel.com --- xf86drm.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xf86drm.c b/xf86drm.c index f7c45f8..5e7306e 100644 --- a/xf86drm.c +++ b/xf86drm.c @@ -635,9 +635,8 @@ static int drmOpenByName(const char *name, int type) drmFreeVersion(version); id = drmGetBusid(fd); drmMsg("drmGetBusid returned '%s'\n", id ? id : "NULL"); - if (!id || !*id) { - if (id) - drmFreeBusid(id); + if (id && *id) { + drmFreeBusid(id); return fd; } else { drmFreeBusid(id);
NAK. The original code is correct.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Guo Yejun yejun.guo@intel.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Guo Yejun yejun.guo@intel.com
xf86drm.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xf86drm.c b/xf86drm.c index f7c45f8..5e7306e 100644 --- a/xf86drm.c +++ b/xf86drm.c @@ -635,9 +635,8 @@ static int drmOpenByName(const char *name, int type) drmFreeVersion(version); id = drmGetBusid(fd); drmMsg("drmGetBusid returned '%s'\n", id ? id : "NULL");
if (!id || !*id) {if (id)drmFreeBusid(id);
This code basically says: If no string was returned (id == NULL), or an empty string (*id == NULL), aka "", then return fd and free id if it was an empty string.
if (id && *id) {drmFreeBusid(id); return fd; } else { drmFreeBusid(id);-- 1.9.1
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
Thanks Daniel Kurtz and Emil Velikov for the reply.
In general, drm APIs are invoked by user mode drivers, but, I want to mimic the behavior of driver in my unit test to create buffer objects. After do some searching, I wrote the following code in my unit test (user mode simple application based on libdrm). It does work in my old system (cannot go back to it and so do not know the exact version), but it failed when porting the unit test based on latest libdrm code. I stepped into function drmOpenByName and thought it is a typo.
int fd = drmOpen("i915", NULL); drm_intel_bufmgr* bufmgr = drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_init(fd, 1024); drm_intel_bo * bo = drm_intel_bo_alloc(bufmgr,...);
After read the comment, looks like the above code is not used as expected. (I execute the utest together with X11 is running).
Back to my original purpose, what's the correct way for me to create bo? One possible way is to open("/dev/dri/renderDxxx"), but what should I do if the kernel version is too low to has this feature?
Thanks. Yejun
-----Original Message----- From: djkurtz@google.com [mailto:djkurtz@google.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Kurtz Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2015 6:53 PM To: Guo, Yejun Cc: dri-devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix typo for drmOpenByName
NAK. The original code is correct.
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Guo Yejun yejun.guo@intel.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Guo Yejun yejun.guo@intel.com
xf86drm.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xf86drm.c b/xf86drm.c index f7c45f8..5e7306e 100644 --- a/xf86drm.c +++ b/xf86drm.c @@ -635,9 +635,8 @@ static int drmOpenByName(const char *name, int type) drmFreeVersion(version); id = drmGetBusid(fd); drmMsg("drmGetBusid returned '%s'\n", id ? id : "NULL");
if (!id || !*id) {if (id)drmFreeBusid(id);
This code basically says: If no string was returned (id == NULL), or an empty string (*id == NULL), aka "", then return fd and free id if it was an empty string.
if (id && *id) {drmFreeBusid(id); return fd; } else { drmFreeBusid(id);-- 1.9.1
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On 14/05/15 12:38, Guo, Yejun wrote:
Thanks Daniel Kurtz and Emil Velikov for the reply.
In general, drm APIs are invoked by user mode drivers, but, I want to mimic the behavior of driver in my unit test to create buffer objects. After do some searching, I wrote the following code in my unit test (user mode simple application based on libdrm). It does work in my old system (cannot go back to it and so do not know the exact version), but it failed when porting the unit test based on latest libdrm code. I stepped into function drmOpenByName and thought it is a typo.
int fd = drmOpen("i915", NULL); drm_intel_bufmgr* bufmgr = drm_intel_bufmgr_gem_init(fd, 1024);drm_intel_bo * bo = drm_intel_bo_alloc(bufmgr,...);
I honestly hope that your code has error checking and you've dropped them here for simplicity.
After read the comment, looks like the above code is not used as expected. (I execute the utest together with X11 is running).
Back to my original purpose, what's the correct way for me to create bo? One possible way is to open("/dev/dri/renderDxxx"), but what should I do if the kernel version is too low to has this feature?
Afaict there are a few solutions possible (listed in order of preference): 1. Run your test without/outside X 2. Opt for render nodes, but it again depends on exactly what your program does*. 3. Use open(...cardX...) directly, but you might need to set/drop master depending your program.
Needless to say personally I would opt for 1 :)
-Emil
* You can confirm with the rest of the Intel crew if your program requires master/root/auth from the drm and/or i915 module. Alternatively you can check with the kernel
$ git grep "DRM_AUTH|DRM_MASTER|DRM_ROOT_ONLY" -- $(linux_top)/drivers/gpu/drm
On 14 May 2015 at 07:17, Guo Yejun yejun.guo@intel.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Guo Yejun yejun.guo@intel.com
xf86drm.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xf86drm.c b/xf86drm.c index f7c45f8..5e7306e 100644 --- a/xf86drm.c +++ b/xf86drm.c @@ -635,9 +635,8 @@ static int drmOpenByName(const char *name, int type) drmFreeVersion(version); id = drmGetBusid(fd); drmMsg("drmGetBusid returned '%s'\n", id ? id : "NULL");
if (!id || !*id) {if (id)drmFreeBusid(id);
if (id && *id) {drmFreeBusid(id);
I believe that it's correct as is, at least according to the comment just before the loop. What makes you think that it's a typo ? Admittedly this function is not too pretty, but most of that is due to it originating from the UMS era.
-Emil
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Daniel Kurtz -
Emil Velikov -
Guo Yejun -
Guo, Yejun