Adding dsi controller and phy entries for idp dt.
Signed-off-by: Harigovindan P harigovi@codeaurora.org --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts index 388f50a..9f42367 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
/dts-v1/;
+#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> #include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h> #include "sc7180.dtsi" #include "pm6150.dtsi" @@ -232,6 +233,50 @@ }; };
+&dsi_controller { + status = "okay"; + + vdda-supply = <&vreg_l3c_1p2>; + + panel@0 { + compatible = "visionox,rm69299-1080p-display"; + reg = <0>; + + vdda-supply = <&vreg_l8c_1p8>; + vdd3p3-supply = <&vreg_l18a_2p8>; + + pinctrl-names = "default", "suspend"; + pinctrl-0 = <&disp_pins_default>; + pinctrl-1 = <&disp_pins_default>; + + reset-gpios = <&pm6150l_gpio 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; + + ports { + #address-cells = <1>; + #size-cells = <0>; + port@0 { + reg = <0>; + panel0_in: endpoint { + remote-endpoint = <&dsi0_out>; + }; + }; + }; + }; + + ports { + port@1 { + endpoint { + remote-endpoint = <&panel0_in>; + data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>; + }; + }; + }; +}; + +&dsi_phy { + status = "okay"; +}; + &qspi { status = "okay"; pinctrl-names = "default"; @@ -289,6 +334,17 @@
/* PINCTRL - additions to nodes defined in sc7180.dtsi */
+&pm6150l_gpio { + disp_pins_default: disp-pins-default{ + pins = "gpio3"; + function = "func1"; + qcom,drive-strength = <2>; + power-source = <0>; + bias-disable; + output-low; + }; +}; + &qspi_clk { pinconf { pins = "gpio63";
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 07:06:57PM +0530, Harigovindan P wrote:
Adding dsi controller and phy entries for idp dt.
Signed-off-by: Harigovindan P harigovi@codeaurora.org
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts index 388f50a..9f42367 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
/dts-v1/;
+#include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h> #include <dt-bindings/regulator/qcom,rpmh-regulator.h> #include "sc7180.dtsi" #include "pm6150.dtsi" @@ -232,6 +233,50 @@ }; };
+&dsi_controller {
- status = "okay";
- vdda-supply = <&vreg_l3c_1p2>;
- panel@0 {
compatible = "visionox,rm69299-1080p-display";
This depends on the series "Add support for rm69299 Visionox panel driver and add devicetree bindings for visionox panel" (https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11320773/) which hasn't landed IIUC. This should be mentioned after '---'.
reg = <0>;vdda-supply = <&vreg_l8c_1p8>;vdd3p3-supply = <&vreg_l18a_2p8>;pinctrl-names = "default", "suspend";pinctrl-0 = <&disp_pins_default>;pinctrl-1 = <&disp_pins_default>;
Is there a point for listing a suspend configuration if it is the same as the default?
reset-gpios = <&pm6150l_gpio 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;ports {#address-cells = <1>;#size-cells = <0>;port@0 {reg = <0>;panel0_in: endpoint {remote-endpoint = <&dsi0_out>;
The 'dsi0_out' node is added by 'arm64: dts: sc7180: add display dt nodes' (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11354253/), which has not landed. So either you should list it as dependency below the commit message, or (probably better) send the two patches in the same series.
};};};- };
- ports {
port@1 {endpoint {remote-endpoint = <&panel0_in>;data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;};};- };
+};
+&dsi_phy {
Also this node does not exist yet, it also depends on the patch mentioned above.
- status = "okay";
+};
&qspi { status = "okay"; pinctrl-names = "default"; @@ -289,6 +334,17 @@
/* PINCTRL - additions to nodes defined in sc7180.dtsi */
+&pm6150l_gpio {
- disp_pins_default: disp-pins-default{
nit: missing blank before curly brace
If there is no suspend configuration you can get rid of the 'default' suffix.
Since this is only a single pin I would suggest to use a name that describes the function of the pin or the name used in the schematic instead of 'disp-pins'.
Thanks
Matthias
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Harigovindan P -
Matthias Kaehlcke