On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:35 AM Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:27AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hi,
On 8/24/2020 12:30 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
Patchset Summary: Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info.
We are version 11 and counting, and it is not clear to me whether there is any chance of getting these patches reviewed and hopefully merged for the 5.10 merge window.
There are a lot of different files being touched, so what would be the ideal way of routing those changes towards inclusion?
FYI, I offered to take the dma-mapping bits through the dma-mapping tree. I have a bit of a backlog, but plan to review and if Jim is ok with that apply the current version.
Sounds good to me. Thanks, Jim
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 09:29:59AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:35 AM Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:27AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hi,
On 8/24/2020 12:30 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
Patchset Summary: Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info.
We are version 11 and counting, and it is not clear to me whether there is any chance of getting these patches reviewed and hopefully merged for the 5.10 merge window.
There are a lot of different files being touched, so what would be the ideal way of routing those changes towards inclusion?
FYI, I offered to take the dma-mapping bits through the dma-mapping tree. I have a bit of a backlog, but plan to review and if Jim is ok with that apply the current version.
Sounds good to me.
Hi Jim,
is the dependency now solved ? Should we review/take this series as is for v5.10 through the PCI tree ?
Thanks, Lorenzo
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:16 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 09:29:59AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:35 AM Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:27AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hi,
On 8/24/2020 12:30 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
Patchset Summary: Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info.
We are version 11 and counting, and it is not clear to me whether there is any chance of getting these patches reviewed and hopefully merged for the 5.10 merge window.
There are a lot of different files being touched, so what would be the ideal way of routing those changes towards inclusion?
FYI, I offered to take the dma-mapping bits through the dma-mapping tree. I have a bit of a backlog, but plan to review and if Jim is ok with that apply the current version.
Sounds good to me.
Hi Jim,
is the dependency now solved ? Should we review/take this series as is for v5.10 through the PCI tree ?
Hello Lorenzo,
We are still working out a regression with the DMA offset commit on the RaspberryPi. Nicolas has found the root cause and we are now devising a solution.
Thanks, Jim Quinlan Broadcom STB
Thanks, Lorenzo
On 9/7/2020 10:43 AM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:16 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 09:29:59AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:35 AM Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:27AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hi,
On 8/24/2020 12:30 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
Patchset Summary: Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info.
We are version 11 and counting, and it is not clear to me whether there is any chance of getting these patches reviewed and hopefully merged for the 5.10 merge window.
There are a lot of different files being touched, so what would be the ideal way of routing those changes towards inclusion?
FYI, I offered to take the dma-mapping bits through the dma-mapping tree. I have a bit of a backlog, but plan to review and if Jim is ok with that apply the current version.
Sounds good to me.
Hi Jim,
is the dependency now solved ? Should we review/take this series as is for v5.10 through the PCI tree ?
Hello Lorenzo,
We are still working out a regression with the DMA offset commit on the RaspberryPi. Nicolas has found the root cause and we are now devising a solution.
Maybe we can parallelize the PCIe driver review while the DMA changes are being worked on in Christoph's branch. Lorenzo, are you fine with the PCIe changes proper?
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 11:29:06AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 9/7/2020 10:43 AM, Jim Quinlan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:16 AM Lorenzo Pieralisi lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 09:29:59AM -0400, Jim Quinlan wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 2:35 AM Christoph Hellwig hch@lst.de wrote:
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 10:40:27AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
Hi,
On 8/24/2020 12:30 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote: > > Patchset Summary: > Enhance a PCIe host controller driver. Because of its unusual design > we are foced to change dev->dma_pfn_offset into a more general role > allowing multiple offsets. See the 'v1' notes below for more info.
We are version 11 and counting, and it is not clear to me whether there is any chance of getting these patches reviewed and hopefully merged for the 5.10 merge window.
There are a lot of different files being touched, so what would be the ideal way of routing those changes towards inclusion?
FYI, I offered to take the dma-mapping bits through the dma-mapping tree. I have a bit of a backlog, but plan to review and if Jim is ok with that apply the current version.
Sounds good to me.
Hi Jim,
is the dependency now solved ? Should we review/take this series as is for v5.10 through the PCI tree ?
Hello Lorenzo,
We are still working out a regression with the DMA offset commit on the RaspberryPi. Nicolas has found the root cause and we are now devising a solution.
Maybe we can parallelize the PCIe driver review while the DMA changes are being worked on in Christoph's branch. Lorenzo, are you fine with the PCIe changes proper?
I will have a look - the main contentious point was about the DMA changes - if Christoph is happy with them I am OK with them too - I hope there is not anything controversial in the host bridge driver itself but I will look into it.
Lorenzo
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Florian Fainelli -
Jim Quinlan -
Lorenzo Pieralisi