By default, GT (and GuC) run at RPn. Requesting for RP0 before firmware load can speed up DMA and HuC auth as well. In addition to writing to 0xA008, we also need to enable swreq in 0xA024 so that Punit will pay heed to our request.
SLPC will restore the frequency back to RPn after initialization, but we need to manually do that for the non-SLPC path.
We don't need a manual override in the SLPC disabled case, just use the intel_rps_set function to ensure consistent RPS state.
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c | 9 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++ 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c index 07ff7ba7b2b7..d576b34c7d6f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c @@ -2226,6 +2226,65 @@ u32 intel_rps_read_state_cap(struct intel_rps *rps) return intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP); }
+static void intel_rps_set_manual(struct intel_rps *rps, bool enable) +{ + struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps); + u32 state = enable ? GEN9_RPSWCTL_ENABLE : GEN9_RPSWCTL_DISABLE; + + /* Allow punit to process software requests */ + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RP_CONTROL, state); +} + +void intel_rps_raise_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps); + u32 rp0_unslice_req; + + mutex_lock(&rps->lock); + + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) { + /* RP limits have not been initialized yet for SLPC path */ + rp0_unslice_req = ((intel_rps_read_state_cap(rps) >> 0) + & 0xff) * GEN9_FREQ_SCALER; + + intel_rps_set_manual(rps, true); + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RPNSWREQ, + ((rp0_unslice_req << + GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT) | + GEN9_IGNORE_SLICE_RATIO)); + intel_rps_set_manual(rps, false); + } else { + intel_rps_set(rps, rps->rp0_freq); + } + + mutex_unlock(&rps->lock); +} + +void intel_rps_lower_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps); + u32 rpn_unslice_req; + + mutex_lock(&rps->lock); + + if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) { + /* RP limits have not been initialized yet for SLPC path */ + rpn_unslice_req = ((intel_rps_read_state_cap(rps) >> 16) + & 0xff) * GEN9_FREQ_SCALER; + + intel_rps_set_manual(rps, true); + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RPNSWREQ, + ((rpn_unslice_req << + GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT) | + GEN9_IGNORE_SLICE_RATIO)); + intel_rps_set_manual(rps, false); + } else { + intel_rps_set(rps, rps->min_freq); + } + + mutex_unlock(&rps->lock); +} + /* External interface for intel_ips.ko */
static struct drm_i915_private __rcu *ips_mchdev; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h index aee12f37d38a..c6d76a3d1331 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ u32 intel_rps_get_rpn_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_read_state_cap(struct intel_rps *rps); +void intel_rps_raise_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps); +void intel_rps_lower_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps);
void gen5_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_rps *rps); void gen6_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pm_iir); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c index 2fef3b0bbe95..3693c4e7dad0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include "intel_guc.h" #include "intel_guc_ads.h" #include "intel_guc_submission.h" +#include "gt/intel_rps.h" #include "intel_uc.h"
#include "i915_drv.h" @@ -462,6 +463,8 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc) else attempts = 1;
+ intel_rps_raise_unslice(&uc_to_gt(uc)->rps); + while (attempts--) { /* * Always reset the GuC just before (re)loading, so @@ -499,6 +502,9 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc) ret = intel_guc_slpc_enable(&guc->slpc); if (ret) goto err_submission; + } else { + /* Restore GT back to RPn for non-SLPC path */ + intel_rps_lower_unslice(&uc_to_gt(uc)->rps); }
drm_info(&i915->drm, "%s firmware %s version %u.%u %s:%s\n", @@ -529,6 +535,9 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc) err_log_capture: __uc_capture_load_err_log(uc); err_out: + /* Return GT back to RPn */ + intel_rps_lower_unslice(&uc_to_gt(uc)->rps); + __uc_sanitize(uc);
if (!ret) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 1891e7fac39b..b2a86a26b843 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -9399,6 +9399,7 @@ enum { #define GEN6_OFFSET(x) ((x) << 19) #define GEN6_AGGRESSIVE_TURBO (0 << 15) #define GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT 23 +#define GEN9_IGNORE_SLICE_RATIO (0 << 0)
#define GEN6_RC_VIDEO_FREQ _MMIO(0xA00C) #define GEN6_RC_CONTROL _MMIO(0xA090) @@ -9434,6 +9435,9 @@ enum { #define GEN6_RP_UP_BUSY_CONT (0x4 << 3) #define GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_AVG (0x2 << 0) #define GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_CONT (0x1 << 0) +#define GEN6_RPSWCTL_SHIFT 9 +#define GEN9_RPSWCTL_ENABLE (0x2 << GEN6_RPSWCTL_SHIFT) +#define GEN9_RPSWCTL_DISABLE (0x0 << GEN6_RPSWCTL_SHIFT) #define GEN6_RP_UP_THRESHOLD _MMIO(0xA02C) #define GEN6_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD _MMIO(0xA030) #define GEN6_RP_CUR_UP_EI _MMIO(0xA050)
On 12/16/2021 3:30 PM, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
By default, GT (and GuC) run at RPn. Requesting for RP0 before firmware load can speed up DMA and HuC auth as well. In addition to writing to 0xA008, we also need to enable swreq in 0xA024 so that Punit will pay heed to our request.
SLPC will restore the frequency back to RPn after initialization, but we need to manually do that for the non-SLPC path.
We don't need a manual override in the SLPC disabled case, just use the intel_rps_set function to ensure consistent RPS state.
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c | 9 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++ 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c index 07ff7ba7b2b7..d576b34c7d6f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c @@ -2226,6 +2226,65 @@ u32 intel_rps_read_state_cap(struct intel_rps *rps) return intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP); }
+static void intel_rps_set_manual(struct intel_rps *rps, bool enable) +{
- struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps);
- u32 state = enable ? GEN9_RPSWCTL_ENABLE : GEN9_RPSWCTL_DISABLE;
- /* Allow punit to process software requests */
- intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RP_CONTROL, state);
+}
Was there a specific reason to remove the set/clear timer functions ?
+void intel_rps_raise_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps) +{
- struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps);
- u32 rp0_unslice_req;
- mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
- if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
/* RP limits have not been initialized yet for SLPC path */rp0_unslice_req = ((intel_rps_read_state_cap(rps) >> 0)& 0xff) * GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;intel_rps_set_manual(rps, true);intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RPNSWREQ,((rp0_unslice_req <<GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT) |GEN9_IGNORE_SLICE_RATIO));intel_rps_set_manual(rps, false);- } else {
intel_rps_set(rps, rps->rp0_freq);- }
- mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
+}
+void intel_rps_lower_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps) +{
- struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps);
- u32 rpn_unslice_req;
- mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
- if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) {
/* RP limits have not been initialized yet for SLPC path */rpn_unslice_req = ((intel_rps_read_state_cap(rps) >> 16)& 0xff) * GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;intel_rps_set_manual(rps, true);intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RPNSWREQ,((rpn_unslice_req <<GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT) |GEN9_IGNORE_SLICE_RATIO));intel_rps_set_manual(rps, false);- } else {
intel_rps_set(rps, rps->min_freq);- }
- mutex_unlock(&rps->lock);
+}
Small function name nitpick maybe unslice_freq ? Just a suggestion.
/* External interface for intel_ips.ko */
static struct drm_i915_private __rcu *ips_mchdev; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h index aee12f37d38a..c6d76a3d1331 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ u32 intel_rps_get_rpn_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_read_state_cap(struct intel_rps *rps); +void intel_rps_raise_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps); +void intel_rps_lower_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps);
void gen5_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_rps *rps); void gen6_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pm_iir); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c index 2fef3b0bbe95..3693c4e7dad0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include "intel_guc.h" #include "intel_guc_ads.h" #include "intel_guc_submission.h" +#include "gt/intel_rps.h" #include "intel_uc.h"
#include "i915_drv.h" @@ -462,6 +463,8 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc) else attempts = 1;
- intel_rps_raise_unslice(&uc_to_gt(uc)->rps);
- while (attempts--) { /*
- Always reset the GuC just before (re)loading, so
@@ -499,6 +502,9 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc) ret = intel_guc_slpc_enable(&guc->slpc); if (ret) goto err_submission;
} else {
/* Restore GT back to RPn for non-SLPC path */intel_rps_lower_unslice(&uc_to_gt(uc)->rps);}
drm_info(&i915->drm, "%s firmware %s version %u.%u %s:%s\n",
@@ -529,6 +535,9 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc) err_log_capture: __uc_capture_load_err_log(uc); err_out:
/* Return GT back to RPn */
intel_rps_lower_unslice(&uc_to_gt(uc)->rps);
__uc_sanitize(uc);
if (!ret) {
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 1891e7fac39b..b2a86a26b843 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -9399,6 +9399,7 @@ enum { #define GEN6_OFFSET(x) ((x) << 19) #define GEN6_AGGRESSIVE_TURBO (0 << 15) #define GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT 23 +#define GEN9_IGNORE_SLICE_RATIO (0 << 0)
#define GEN6_RC_VIDEO_FREQ _MMIO(0xA00C) #define GEN6_RC_CONTROL _MMIO(0xA090) @@ -9434,6 +9435,9 @@ enum { #define GEN6_RP_UP_BUSY_CONT (0x4 << 3) #define GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_AVG (0x2 << 0) #define GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_CONT (0x1 << 0) +#define GEN6_RPSWCTL_SHIFT 9 +#define GEN9_RPSWCTL_ENABLE (0x2 << GEN6_RPSWCTL_SHIFT) +#define GEN9_RPSWCTL_DISABLE (0x0 << GEN6_RPSWCTL_SHIFT) #define GEN6_RP_UP_THRESHOLD _MMIO(0xA02C) #define GEN6_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD _MMIO(0xA030) #define GEN6_RP_CUR_UP_EI _MMIO(0xA050)
Regards,
Suja
On 12/20/2021 3:52 PM, Sundaresan, Sujaritha wrote:
On 12/16/2021 3:30 PM, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
By default, GT (and GuC) run at RPn. Requesting for RP0 before firmware load can speed up DMA and HuC auth as well. In addition to writing to 0xA008, we also need to enable swreq in 0xA024 so that Punit will pay heed to our request.
SLPC will restore the frequency back to RPn after initialization, but we need to manually do that for the non-SLPC path.
We don't need a manual override in the SLPC disabled case, just use the intel_rps_set function to ensure consistent RPS state.
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c | 9 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++ 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c index 07ff7ba7b2b7..d576b34c7d6f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c @@ -2226,6 +2226,65 @@ u32 intel_rps_read_state_cap(struct intel_rps *rps) return intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP); } +static void intel_rps_set_manual(struct intel_rps *rps, bool enable) +{ + struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps); + u32 state = enable ? GEN9_RPSWCTL_ENABLE : GEN9_RPSWCTL_DISABLE;
+ /* Allow punit to process software requests */ + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RP_CONTROL, state); +}
Was there a specific reason to remove the set/clear timer functions ?
Replying on behalf of Vinay Belguamkar:
We are now using the intel_rps_set() function which handles more state update in the correct rps path. We also obtain an rps lock which guarantees not clobbering rps data. The set/clear timers were being done when we were modifying the frequency outside of the rps paths. rps_set_manual is now only called in the SLPC path where the rps timers are not even running.
+void intel_rps_raise_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps); + u32 rp0_unslice_req;
+ mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
+ if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) { + /* RP limits have not been initialized yet for SLPC path */ + rp0_unslice_req = ((intel_rps_read_state_cap(rps) >> 0) + & 0xff) * GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;
+ intel_rps_set_manual(rps, true); + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RPNSWREQ, + ((rp0_unslice_req << + GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT) | + GEN9_IGNORE_SLICE_RATIO)); + intel_rps_set_manual(rps, false); + } else { + intel_rps_set(rps, rps->rp0_freq); + }
+ mutex_unlock(&rps->lock); +}
+void intel_rps_lower_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps); + u32 rpn_unslice_req;
+ mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
+ if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) { + /* RP limits have not been initialized yet for SLPC path */ + rpn_unslice_req = ((intel_rps_read_state_cap(rps) >> 16) + & 0xff) * GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;
+ intel_rps_set_manual(rps, true); + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RPNSWREQ, + ((rpn_unslice_req << + GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT) | + GEN9_IGNORE_SLICE_RATIO)); + intel_rps_set_manual(rps, false); + } else { + intel_rps_set(rps, rps->min_freq); + }
+ mutex_unlock(&rps->lock); +}
Small function name nitpick maybe unslice_freq ? Just a suggestion.
/* External interface for intel_ips.ko */ static struct drm_i915_private __rcu *ips_mchdev; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h index aee12f37d38a..c6d76a3d1331 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ u32 intel_rps_get_rpn_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_read_state_cap(struct intel_rps *rps); +void intel_rps_raise_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps); +void intel_rps_lower_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps); void gen5_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_rps *rps); void gen6_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pm_iir); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c index 2fef3b0bbe95..3693c4e7dad0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include "intel_guc.h" #include "intel_guc_ads.h" #include "intel_guc_submission.h" +#include "gt/intel_rps.h" #include "intel_uc.h" #include "i915_drv.h" @@ -462,6 +463,8 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc) else attempts = 1; + intel_rps_raise_unslice(&uc_to_gt(uc)->rps);
while (attempts--) { /* * Always reset the GuC just before (re)loading, so @@ -499,6 +502,9 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc) ret = intel_guc_slpc_enable(&guc->slpc); if (ret) goto err_submission; + } else { + /* Restore GT back to RPn for non-SLPC path */ + intel_rps_lower_unslice(&uc_to_gt(uc)->rps); } drm_info(&i915->drm, "%s firmware %s version %u.%u %s:%s\n", @@ -529,6 +535,9 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc) err_log_capture: __uc_capture_load_err_log(uc); err_out: + /* Return GT back to RPn */ + intel_rps_lower_unslice(&uc_to_gt(uc)->rps);
__uc_sanitize(uc); if (!ret) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 1891e7fac39b..b2a86a26b843 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -9399,6 +9399,7 @@ enum { #define GEN6_OFFSET(x) ((x) << 19) #define GEN6_AGGRESSIVE_TURBO (0 << 15) #define GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT 23 +#define GEN9_IGNORE_SLICE_RATIO (0 << 0) #define GEN6_RC_VIDEO_FREQ _MMIO(0xA00C) #define GEN6_RC_CONTROL _MMIO(0xA090) @@ -9434,6 +9435,9 @@ enum { #define GEN6_RP_UP_BUSY_CONT (0x4 << 3) #define GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_AVG (0x2 << 0) #define GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_CONT (0x1 << 0) +#define GEN6_RPSWCTL_SHIFT 9 +#define GEN9_RPSWCTL_ENABLE (0x2 << GEN6_RPSWCTL_SHIFT) +#define GEN9_RPSWCTL_DISABLE (0x0 << GEN6_RPSWCTL_SHIFT) #define GEN6_RP_UP_THRESHOLD _MMIO(0xA02C) #define GEN6_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD _MMIO(0xA030) #define GEN6_RP_CUR_UP_EI _MMIO(0xA050)
Regards,
Suja
On 12/21/2021 10:11 AM, Ewins, Jon wrote:
On 12/20/2021 3:52 PM, Sundaresan, Sujaritha wrote:
On 12/16/2021 3:30 PM, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
By default, GT (and GuC) run at RPn. Requesting for RP0 before firmware load can speed up DMA and HuC auth as well. In addition to writing to 0xA008, we also need to enable swreq in 0xA024 so that Punit will pay heed to our request.
SLPC will restore the frequency back to RPn after initialization, but we need to manually do that for the non-SLPC path.
We don't need a manual override in the SLPC disabled case, just use the intel_rps_set function to ensure consistent RPS state.
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h | 2 + drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c | 9 ++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 4 ++ 4 files changed, 74 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c index 07ff7ba7b2b7..d576b34c7d6f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.c @@ -2226,6 +2226,65 @@ u32 intel_rps_read_state_cap(struct intel_rps *rps) return intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN6_RP_STATE_CAP); } +static void intel_rps_set_manual(struct intel_rps *rps, bool enable) +{ + struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps); + u32 state = enable ? GEN9_RPSWCTL_ENABLE : GEN9_RPSWCTL_DISABLE;
+ /* Allow punit to process software requests */ + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RP_CONTROL, state); +}
Was there a specific reason to remove the set/clear timer functions ?
Replying on behalf of Vinay Belguamkar:
We are now using the intel_rps_set() function which handles more state update in the correct rps path. We also obtain an rps lock which guarantees not clobbering rps data. The set/clear timers were being done when we were modifying the frequency outside of the rps paths. rps_set_manual is now only called in the SLPC path where the rps timers are not even running.
Got it.
Reviewed-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com
+void intel_rps_raise_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps); + u32 rp0_unslice_req;
+ mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
+ if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) { + /* RP limits have not been initialized yet for SLPC path */ + rp0_unslice_req = ((intel_rps_read_state_cap(rps) >> 0) + & 0xff) * GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;
+ intel_rps_set_manual(rps, true); + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RPNSWREQ, + ((rp0_unslice_req << + GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT) | + GEN9_IGNORE_SLICE_RATIO)); + intel_rps_set_manual(rps, false); + } else { + intel_rps_set(rps, rps->rp0_freq); + }
+ mutex_unlock(&rps->lock); +}
+void intel_rps_lower_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps) +{ + struct intel_uncore *uncore = rps_to_uncore(rps); + u32 rpn_unslice_req;
+ mutex_lock(&rps->lock);
+ if (rps_uses_slpc(rps)) { + /* RP limits have not been initialized yet for SLPC path */ + rpn_unslice_req = ((intel_rps_read_state_cap(rps) >> 16) + & 0xff) * GEN9_FREQ_SCALER;
+ intel_rps_set_manual(rps, true); + intel_uncore_write(uncore, GEN6_RPNSWREQ, + ((rpn_unslice_req << + GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT) | + GEN9_IGNORE_SLICE_RATIO)); + intel_rps_set_manual(rps, false); + } else { + intel_rps_set(rps, rps->min_freq); + }
+ mutex_unlock(&rps->lock); +}
Small function name nitpick maybe unslice_freq ? Just a suggestion.
/* External interface for intel_ips.ko */ static struct drm_i915_private __rcu *ips_mchdev; diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h index aee12f37d38a..c6d76a3d1331 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_rps.h @@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ u32 intel_rps_get_rpn_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_read_punit_req_frequency(struct intel_rps *rps); u32 intel_rps_read_state_cap(struct intel_rps *rps); +void intel_rps_raise_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps); +void intel_rps_lower_unslice(struct intel_rps *rps); void gen5_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_rps *rps); void gen6_rps_irq_handler(struct intel_rps *rps, u32 pm_iir); diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c index 2fef3b0bbe95..3693c4e7dad0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ #include "intel_guc.h" #include "intel_guc_ads.h" #include "intel_guc_submission.h" +#include "gt/intel_rps.h" #include "intel_uc.h" #include "i915_drv.h" @@ -462,6 +463,8 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc) else attempts = 1; + intel_rps_raise_unslice(&uc_to_gt(uc)->rps);
while (attempts--) { /* * Always reset the GuC just before (re)loading, so @@ -499,6 +502,9 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc) ret = intel_guc_slpc_enable(&guc->slpc); if (ret) goto err_submission; + } else { + /* Restore GT back to RPn for non-SLPC path */ + intel_rps_lower_unslice(&uc_to_gt(uc)->rps); } drm_info(&i915->drm, "%s firmware %s version %u.%u %s:%s\n", @@ -529,6 +535,9 @@ static int __uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc) err_log_capture: __uc_capture_load_err_log(uc); err_out: + /* Return GT back to RPn */ + intel_rps_lower_unslice(&uc_to_gt(uc)->rps);
__uc_sanitize(uc); if (!ret) { diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 1891e7fac39b..b2a86a26b843 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -9399,6 +9399,7 @@ enum { #define GEN6_OFFSET(x) ((x) << 19) #define GEN6_AGGRESSIVE_TURBO (0 << 15) #define GEN9_SW_REQ_UNSLICE_RATIO_SHIFT 23 +#define GEN9_IGNORE_SLICE_RATIO (0 << 0) #define GEN6_RC_VIDEO_FREQ _MMIO(0xA00C) #define GEN6_RC_CONTROL _MMIO(0xA090) @@ -9434,6 +9435,9 @@ enum { #define GEN6_RP_UP_BUSY_CONT (0x4 << 3) #define GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_AVG (0x2 << 0) #define GEN6_RP_DOWN_IDLE_CONT (0x1 << 0) +#define GEN6_RPSWCTL_SHIFT 9 +#define GEN9_RPSWCTL_ENABLE (0x2 << GEN6_RPSWCTL_SHIFT) +#define GEN9_RPSWCTL_DISABLE (0x0 << GEN6_RPSWCTL_SHIFT) #define GEN6_RP_UP_THRESHOLD _MMIO(0xA02C) #define GEN6_RP_DOWN_THRESHOLD _MMIO(0xA030) #define GEN6_RP_CUR_UP_EI _MMIO(0xA050)
Regards,
Suja
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Ewins, Jon -
Sundaresan, Sujaritha -
Vinay Belgaumkar