On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 4:05 AM, Christian König deathsimple@vodafone.de wrote:

From: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com

Currently doesn't matter cause we allocate the fence in the lower 265MB anyway.

Reported-by: Frank Huang FrankR.Huang@amd.com Signed-off-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com

Applied to my fixes tree. Thanks!

Alex

---

drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c index 2d3655f..44bdb28 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c @@ -3019,7 +3019,7 @@ void r600_uvd_fence_emit(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct radeon_fence *fence) { struct radeon_ring *ring = &rdev->ring[fence->ring];

•   uint32_t addr = rdev->fence_drv[fence->ring].gpu_addr;
  

•   uint64_t addr = rdev->fence_drv[fence->ring].gpu_addr;
  
    radeon_ring_write(ring, PACKET0(UVD_CONTEXT_ID, 0));
    radeon_ring_write(ring, fence->seq);
  

-- 1.7.9.5