Some examples were missing the unit names triggering
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): .../panel: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
warnings when used verbatim in DTs and running dtc with W=1.
Signed-off-by: Guido Günther agx@sigxcpu.org --- .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p079zca.txt | 2 +- .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p097pfg.txt | 2 +- .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/kingdisplay,kd097d04.txt | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p079zca.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p079zca.txt index d0f55161579a..3ab8c7412cf6 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p079zca.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p079zca.txt @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Optional properties: Example:
&mipi_dsi { - panel { + panel@0 { compatible = "innolux,p079zca"; reg = <0>; power-supply = <...>; diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p097pfg.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p097pfg.txt index 595d9dfeffd3..d1cab3a8f0fb 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p097pfg.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p097pfg.txt @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Optional properties: Example:
&mipi_dsi { - panel { + panel@0 { compatible = "innolux,p079zca"; reg = <0>; avdd-supply = <...>; diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/kingdisplay,kd097d04.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/kingdisplay,kd097d04.txt index 164a5fa236da..cfefff688614 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/kingdisplay,kd097d04.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/kingdisplay,kd097d04.txt @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Optional properties: Example:
&mipi_dsi { - panel { + panel@0 { compatible = "kingdisplay,kd097d04"; reg = <0>; power-supply = <...>;
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 17:08:10 +0100, =?UTF-8?q?Guido=20G=C3=BCnther?= wrote:
Some examples were missing the unit names triggering
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): .../panel: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
warnings when used verbatim in DTs and running dtc with W=1.
Signed-off-by: Guido Günther agx@sigxcpu.org
.../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p079zca.txt | 2 +- .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p097pfg.txt | 2 +- .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/kingdisplay,kd097d04.txt | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 05:08:10PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote:
Some examples were missing the unit names triggering
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): .../panel: node has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name
warnings when used verbatim in DTs and running dtc with W=1.
Signed-off-by: Guido Günther agx@sigxcpu.org
.../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p079zca.txt | 2 +- .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/innolux,p097pfg.txt | 2 +- .../devicetree/bindings/display/panel/kingdisplay,kd097d04.txt | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks.
Thierry
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org