The Lenovo Yoga Book X91F/L uses a panel which has been mounted 90 degrees rotated. Add a quirk for this.
Cc: Yauhen Kharuzhy jekhor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c index d92b9408fe48..2cced702d225 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c @@ -262,6 +262,12 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id orientation_data[] = { DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION, "Lenovo ideapad D330-10IGM"), }, .driver_data = (void *)&lcd1200x1920_rightside_up, + }, { /* Lenovo Yoga Book X90F / X91F / X91L */ + .matches = { + /* Non exact match to match all versions */ + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Lenovo YB1-X9"), + }, + .driver_data = (void *)&lcd1200x1920_rightside_up, }, { /* OneGX1 Pro */ .matches = { DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "SYSTEM_MANUFACTURER"),
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 02:02:27PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
The Lenovo Yoga Book X91F/L uses a panel which has been mounted 90 degrees rotated. Add a quirk for this.
Tested on my Yoga Book, works.
Acked-by: Yauhen Kharuzhy jekhor@gmail.com
Cc: Yauhen Kharuzhy jekhor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede hdegoede@redhat.com
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c | 6 ++++++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c index d92b9408fe48..2cced702d225 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_panel_orientation_quirks.c @@ -262,6 +262,12 @@ static const struct dmi_system_id orientation_data[] = { DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION, "Lenovo ideapad D330-10IGM"), }, .driver_data = (void *)&lcd1200x1920_rightside_up,
- }, { /* Lenovo Yoga Book X90F / X91F / X91L */
.matches = {/* Non exact match to match all versions */DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "Lenovo YB1-X9"),},.driver_data = (void *)&lcd1200x1920_rightside_up,-- 2.31.1
Hi Yauhen, On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 12:59:11AM +0300, Yauhen Kharuzhy wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 02:02:27PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
The Lenovo Yoga Book X91F/L uses a panel which has been mounted 90 degrees rotated. Add a quirk for this.
Tested on my Yoga Book, works.
Great - and then it would be prudent that you acknowledge this with: Tested-by: Yauhen Kharuzhy jekhor@gmail.com
A "Tested-by:" is in many cases better than an Acked-by: because you actually applied the patch, build it and verified that it works. Where an Acked-by: is just to say that you have looked at the patch and agrees with the patch.
So a Tested-by: gives you the credit you deserve here.
Sam
On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 11:12:56AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Hi Yauhen, On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 12:59:11AM +0300, Yauhen Kharuzhy wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 02:02:27PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
The Lenovo Yoga Book X91F/L uses a panel which has been mounted 90 degrees rotated. Add a quirk for this.
Tested on my Yoga Book, works.
Great - and then it would be prudent that you acknowledge this with: Tested-by: Yauhen Kharuzhy jekhor@gmail.com
A "Tested-by:" is in many cases better than an Acked-by: because you actually applied the patch, build it and verified that it works. Where an Acked-by: is just to say that you have looked at the patch and agrees with the patch.
So a Tested-by: gives you the credit you deserve here.
Yes, of course. I forgot about such option.
Tested-by: Yauhen Kharuzhy jekhor@gmail.com
Hi,
On 11/7/21 12:27, Yauhen Kharuzhy wrote:
On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 11:12:56AM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Hi Yauhen, On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 12:59:11AM +0300, Yauhen Kharuzhy wrote:
On Sat, Nov 06, 2021 at 02:02:27PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
The Lenovo Yoga Book X91F/L uses a panel which has been mounted 90 degrees rotated. Add a quirk for this.
Tested on my Yoga Book, works.
Great - and then it would be prudent that you acknowledge this with: Tested-by: Yauhen Kharuzhy jekhor@gmail.com
A "Tested-by:" is in many cases better than an Acked-by: because you actually applied the patch, build it and verified that it works. Where an Acked-by: is just to say that you have looked at the patch and agrees with the patch.
So a Tested-by: gives you the credit you deserve here.
Yes, of course. I forgot about such option.
Tested-by: Yauhen Kharuzhy jekhor@gmail.com
Thank you, I've pushed this to drm-misc-next now.
Regards,
Hans
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Hans de Goede -
Sam Ravnborg -
Simon Ser -
Yauhen Kharuzhy