Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
between commit:
9f58892ea996 ("drm/i915: Pull all the reset functionality together into i915_reset.c")
from the drm tree and commit:
d0e93599d396 ("drm/i915: prepare for drmP.h removal from drm_modeset_helper.h")
from the drm-misc tree.
I fixed it up (I think I got the right include files in the right order in the end - see below and please check the final result) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
On Fri, Feb 08, 2019 at 12:27:44PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
between commit:
9f58892ea996 ("drm/i915: Pull all the reset functionality together into i915_reset.c")
from the drm tree and commit:
d0e93599d396 ("drm/i915: prepare for drmP.h removal from drm_modeset_helper.h")
from the drm-misc tree.
I fixed it up (I think I got the right include files in the right order in the end - see below and please check the final result) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
There isn't a "below" afaics .... -Daniel
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 09:53:33 +0100 Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
There isn't a "below" afaics ....
Oops :-( However the merge diff is not very enlightening in this case anyway. It makes more sense to look at the final result when I finish up in a while.
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 10:26 AM Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 09:53:33 +0100 Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
There isn't a "below" afaics ....
Oops :-( However the merge diff is not very enlightening in this case anyway. It makes more sense to look at the final result when I finish up in a while.
Yeah conflict isn't too bad either, and we have it in the drm rr-cache already. So not worried, just wanted to check whether there's more. -Daniel
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org