In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c: In function ‘xenfb_backend_changed’: drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c:678:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) ^ drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c:681:2: note: here case XenbusStateClosing: ^~~~
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com --- drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c index 6a4bbc9e1fb0..a3d6b6db221b 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static void xenfb_backend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, case XenbusStateClosed: if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) break; - /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */ + /* fall through - Missed the backend's CLOSING state. */ case XenbusStateClosing: xenbus_frontend_closed(dev); break;
+Xen-devel list
On 2/27/19 10:53 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c: In function ‘xenfb_backend_changed’: drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c:678:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) ^ drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c:681:2: note: here case XenbusStateClosing: ^~~~
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com
drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c index 6a4bbc9e1fb0..a3d6b6db221b 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static void xenfb_backend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, case XenbusStateClosed: if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) break;
/* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */
case XenbusStateClosing: xenbus_frontend_closed(dev); break;/* fall through - Missed the backend's CLOSING state. */
Hi all,
Friendly ping:
Who can take this?
Thanks -- Gustavo
On 2/28/19 5:51 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
+Xen-devel list
On 2/27/19 10:53 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c: In function ‘xenfb_backend_changed’: drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c:678:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) ^ drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c:681:2: note: here case XenbusStateClosing: ^~~~
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com
drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c index 6a4bbc9e1fb0..a3d6b6db221b 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static void xenfb_backend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, case XenbusStateClosed: if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) break; - /* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */ + /* fall through - Missed the backend's CLOSING state. */ case XenbusStateClosing: xenbus_frontend_closed(dev); break;
Hi,
On 03/20/2019 09:08 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi all,
Friendly ping:
Who can take this?
I'll take this for v5.2.
Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
Thanks
Gustavo
On 2/28/19 5:51 AM, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
+Xen-devel list
On 2/27/19 10:53 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warning:
drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c: In function ‘xenfb_backend_changed’: drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c:678:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=] if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) ^ drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c:681:2: note: here case XenbusStateClosing: ^~~~
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
Notice that, in this particular case, the code comment is modified in accordance with what GCC is expecting to find.
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com
drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c index 6a4bbc9e1fb0..a3d6b6db221b 100644 --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/xen-fbfront.c @@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ static void xenfb_backend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, case XenbusStateClosed: if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) break;
/* Missed the backend's CLOSING state -- fallthrough */
/* fall through - Missed the backend's CLOSING state. */ case XenbusStateClosing: xenbus_frontend_closed(dev); break;
On 03/21/2019 12:03 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
On 03/20/2019 09:08 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi all,
Friendly ping:
Who can take this?
I'll take this for v5.2.
Patch queued for v5.2, thanks.
Best regards, -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org