On 22/03/2021 18:41, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

From: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de

An old patch added a 'return' statement after each BUG() in this driver, which was necessary at the time, but has become redundant after the BUG() definition was updated to handle this properly.

gcc-11 now warns about one such instance, where the 'return' statement was incorrectly indented:

drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c: In function ‘pixinc’: drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c:2093:9: error: this ‘else’ clause does not guard... [-Werror=misleading-indentation] 2093 | else | ^~~~ drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c:2095:17: note: ...this statement, but the latter is misleadingly indented as if it were guarded by the ‘else’ 2095 | return 0; | ^~~~~~

Address this by removing the return again and changing the BUG() to be unconditional to make this more intuitive.

Fixes: c6eee968d40d ("OMAPDSS: remove compiler warnings when CONFIG_BUG=n") Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann arnd@arndb.de

---

drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c index f4cbef8ccace..5619420cc2cc 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/dispc.c @@ -2090,9 +2090,8 @@ static s32 pixinc(int pixels, u8 ps) return 1 + (pixels - 1) * ps; else if (pixels < 0) return 1 - (-pixels + 1) * ps;

• else

• BUG();
  

• return 0;
  

• BUG(); }

  static void calc_offset(u16 screen_width, u16 width,

Thanks, I'll pick this up.

Tomi