Objtool reports:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x36: redundant UACCESS disable
__copy_from_user() already does both STAC and CLAC, so the user_access_end() in its error path adds an extra unnecessary CLAC.
Fixes: 0b2c8f8b6b0c ("i915: fix missing user_access_end() in page fault exception case") Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com Tested-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/617 Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com --- .../gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c | 20 +++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c index 5fae0e50aad0..41dab9ea33cd 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c @@ -1628,6 +1628,7 @@ static int check_relocations(const struct drm_i915_gem_exec_object2 *entry)
static int eb_copy_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb) { + struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *relocs; const unsigned int count = eb->buffer_count; unsigned int i; int err; @@ -1635,7 +1636,6 @@ static int eb_copy_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb) for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { const unsigned int nreloc = eb->exec[i].relocation_count; struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry __user *urelocs; - struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *relocs; unsigned long size; unsigned long copied;
@@ -1663,14 +1663,8 @@ static int eb_copy_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
if (__copy_from_user((char *)relocs + copied, (char __user *)urelocs + copied, - len)) { -end_user: - user_access_end(); -end: - kvfree(relocs); - err = -EFAULT; - goto err; - } + len)) + goto end;
copied += len; } while (copied < size); @@ -1699,10 +1693,14 @@ static int eb_copy_relocations(const struct i915_execbuffer *eb)
return 0;
+end_user: + user_access_end(); +end: + kvfree(relocs); + err = -EFAULT; err: while (i--) { - struct drm_i915_gem_relocation_entry *relocs = - u64_to_ptr(typeof(*relocs), eb->exec[i].relocs_ptr); + relocs = u64_to_ptr(typeof(*relocs), eb->exec[i].relocs_ptr); if (eb->exec[i].relocation_count) kvfree(relocs); }
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
Objtool reports:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x36: redundant UACCESS disable
__copy_from_user() already does both STAC and CLAC, so the user_access_end() in its error path adds an extra unnecessary CLAC.
Fixes: 0b2c8f8b6b0c ("i915: fix missing user_access_end() in page fault exception case") Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com Tested-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/617 Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de
Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-25 22:55:45)
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
Objtool reports:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x36: redundant UACCESS disable
__copy_from_user() already does both STAC and CLAC, so the user_access_end() in its error path adds an extra unnecessary CLAC.
Fixes: 0b2c8f8b6b0c ("i915: fix missing user_access_end() in page fault exception case") Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com Tested-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/617 Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de
Which tree do you plan to apply it to? I can put in drm-intel, and with the fixes tag it will percolate through to 5.3 and beyond, but if you want to apply it directly to squash the build warnings, feel free. -Chris
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-25 22:55:45)
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
Objtool reports:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x36: redundant UACCESS disable
__copy_from_user() already does both STAC and CLAC, so the user_access_end() in its error path adds an extra unnecessary CLAC.
Fixes: 0b2c8f8b6b0c ("i915: fix missing user_access_end() in page fault exception case") Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com Tested-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/617 Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de
Which tree do you plan to apply it to? I can put in drm-intel, and with the fixes tag it will percolate through to 5.3 and beyond, but if you want to apply it directly to squash the build warnings, feel free.
It would be nice to get it into 5.3. I can route it linuxwards if you give an Acked-by, but I'm happy to hand it to you :)
Thanks,
tglx
Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-26 20:18:32)
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-25 22:55:45)
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
Objtool reports:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x36: redundant UACCESS disable
__copy_from_user() already does both STAC and CLAC, so the user_access_end() in its error path adds an extra unnecessary CLAC.
Fixes: 0b2c8f8b6b0c ("i915: fix missing user_access_end() in page fault exception case") Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com Tested-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/617 Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de
Which tree do you plan to apply it to? I can put in drm-intel, and with the fixes tag it will percolate through to 5.3 and beyond, but if you want to apply it directly to squash the build warnings, feel free.
It would be nice to get it into 5.3. I can route it linuxwards if you give an Acked-by, but I'm happy to hand it to you :)
Acked-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk -Chris
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 9:30 PM Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-26 20:18:32)
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-25 22:55:45)
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
Objtool reports:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x36: redundant UACCESS disable
__copy_from_user() already does both STAC and CLAC, so the user_access_end() in its error path adds an extra unnecessary CLAC.
Fixes: 0b2c8f8b6b0c ("i915: fix missing user_access_end() in page fault exception case") Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com Tested-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/617 Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de
Which tree do you plan to apply it to? I can put in drm-intel, and with the fixes tag it will percolate through to 5.3 and beyond, but if you want to apply it directly to squash the build warnings, feel free.
It would be nice to get it into 5.3. I can route it linuxwards if you give an Acked-by, but I'm happy to hand it to you :)
Acked-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Thomas did you take this through tip tree after Chris' ACK?
- Sedat -
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:25 PM Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 9:30 PM Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-26 20:18:32)
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-25 22:55:45)
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
Objtool reports:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x36: redundant UACCESS disable
__copy_from_user() already does both STAC and CLAC, so the user_access_end() in its error path adds an extra unnecessary CLAC.
Fixes: 0b2c8f8b6b0c ("i915: fix missing user_access_end() in page fault exception case") Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com Tested-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/617 Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de
Which tree do you plan to apply it to? I can put in drm-intel, and with the fixes tag it will percolate through to 5.3 and beyond, but if you want to apply it directly to squash the build warnings, feel free.
It would be nice to get it into 5.3. I can route it linuxwards if you give an Acked-by, but I'm happy to hand it to you :)
Acked-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Thomas did you take this through tip tree after Chris' ACK?
Hi,
Gentle ping... Thomas and Chris: Will someone of you pick this up? As "objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage" [1] went trough tip tree I highly appreciate to do so with this one.
Thanks.
Regards, - Sedat -
[1] https://git.kernel.org/linus/882a0db9d143e5e8dac54b96e83135bccd1f68d1 [2] https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/617
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 09:29:53PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:25 PM Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 9:30 PM Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-26 20:18:32)
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-25 22:55:45)
On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> Objtool reports: > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x36: redundant UACCESS disable > > __copy_from_user() already does both STAC and CLAC, so the > user_access_end() in its error path adds an extra unnecessary CLAC. > > Fixes: 0b2c8f8b6b0c ("i915: fix missing user_access_end() in page fault exception case") > Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de > Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org > Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com > Tested-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/617 > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de
Which tree do you plan to apply it to? I can put in drm-intel, and with the fixes tag it will percolate through to 5.3 and beyond, but if you want to apply it directly to squash the build warnings, feel free.
It would be nice to get it into 5.3. I can route it linuxwards if you give an Acked-by, but I'm happy to hand it to you :)
Acked-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Thomas did you take this through tip tree after Chris' ACK?
Hi,
Gentle ping... Thomas and Chris: Will someone of you pick this up? As "objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage" [1] went trough tip tree I highly appreciate to do so with this one.
I think Thomas has gone on holiday, so hopefully Chris can pick it up after all.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:59 AM Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 09:29:53PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 2:25 PM Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 9:30 PM Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-26 20:18:32)
On Fri, 26 Jul 2019, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Thomas Gleixner (2019-07-25 22:55:45) > On Thu, 25 Jul 2019, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > > > Objtool reports: > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.o: warning: objtool: .altinstr_replacement+0x36: redundant UACCESS disable > > > > __copy_from_user() already does both STAC and CLAC, so the > > user_access_end() in its error path adds an extra unnecessary CLAC. > > > > Fixes: 0b2c8f8b6b0c ("i915: fix missing user_access_end() in page fault exception case") > > Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de > > Reported-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com > > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) peterz@infradead.org > > Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com > > Tested-by: Sedat Dilek sedat.dilek@gmail.com > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/617 > > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de
Which tree do you plan to apply it to? I can put in drm-intel, and with the fixes tag it will percolate through to 5.3 and beyond, but if you want to apply it directly to squash the build warnings, feel free.
It would be nice to get it into 5.3. I can route it linuxwards if you give an Acked-by, but I'm happy to hand it to you :)
Acked-by: Chris Wilson chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Thomas did you take this through tip tree after Chris' ACK?
Hi,
Gentle ping... Thomas and Chris: Will someone of you pick this up? As "objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage" [1] went trough tip tree I highly appreciate to do so with this one.
I think Thomas has gone on holiday, so hopefully Chris can pick it up after all.
tglx just picked up 2 other patches of mine, bumping just in case he's not picking up patches while on vacation. ;)
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 5:59 AM Josh Poimboeuf jpoimboe@redhat.com wrote:
Gentle ping... Thomas and Chris: Will someone of you pick this up? As "objtool: Improve UACCESS coverage" [1] went trough tip tree I highly appreciate to do so with this one.
I think Thomas has gone on holiday, so hopefully Chris can pick it up after all.
tglx just picked up 2 other patches of mine, bumping just in case he's not picking up patches while on vacation. ;)
I'm only half on vacation :)
So I can pick it up.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 1:22 PM Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de wrote:
tglx just picked up 2 other patches of mine, bumping just in case he's not picking up patches while on vacation. ;)
I'm only half on vacation :)
So I can pick it up.
Thanks, will send half margaritas.
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 1:03 AM Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 1:22 PM Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de wrote:
tglx just picked up 2 other patches of mine, bumping just in case he's not picking up patches while on vacation. ;)
I'm only half on vacation :)
So I can pick it up.
Thanks, will send half margaritas.
Sends some Turkish Cay.
- Sedat -
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 1:03 AM Nick Desaulniers ndesaulniers@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 1:22 PM Thomas Gleixner tglx@linutronix.de wrote:
tglx just picked up 2 other patches of mine, bumping just in case he's not picking up patches while on vacation. ;)
I'm only half on vacation :)
So I can pick it up.
Thanks, will send half margaritas.
Sends some Turkish Cay.
One day, I'm going to collect all the things people promised to send or buy me in the past 15 years. That's going to be a really huge party :)
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org