This file doesn't need everything provided by <linux/kernel.h>. All it needs are some types, which are provided by <linux/types.h>.
Note, <drm/drm_mode.h> already includes <linux/types.h>, but not relying on implicit includes is indeed a good thing.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com --- v2: Update commit message (Geert, Laurent) include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h b/include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h index fe815d7d9f58..08605fdb2226 100644 --- a/include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ #ifndef __SHMOB_DRM_H__ #define __SHMOB_DRM_H__
-#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/types.h>
#include <drm/drm_mode.h>
Hi Andy,
On 05/02/2020 09:32, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
This file doesn't need everything provided by <linux/kernel.h>. All it needs are some types, which are provided by <linux/types.h>.
Note, <drm/drm_mode.h> already includes <linux/types.h>, but not relying on implicit includes is indeed a good thing.
This explains things a bit better :-)
I'm sure the others will follow too, but here's my:
Reviewed-by: Kieran Bingham kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
v2: Update commit message (Geert, Laurent) include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h b/include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h index fe815d7d9f58..08605fdb2226 100644 --- a/include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ #ifndef __SHMOB_DRM_H__ #define __SHMOB_DRM_H__
-#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/types.h>
#include <drm/drm_mode.h>
Hi Andy,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 11:32:26AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
This file doesn't need everything provided by <linux/kernel.h>. All it needs are some types, which are provided by <linux/types.h>.
Note, <drm/drm_mode.h> already includes <linux/types.h>, but not relying on implicit includes is indeed a good thing.
Do we even need linux/types.h ? Apart from struct drm_mode_modeinfo, shmob_drm.h seems to only contain plain C without using any externally defined types.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
v2: Update commit message (Geert, Laurent) include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h b/include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h index fe815d7d9f58..08605fdb2226 100644 --- a/include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h +++ b/include/linux/platform_data/shmob_drm.h @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ #ifndef __SHMOB_DRM_H__ #define __SHMOB_DRM_H__
-#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/types.h>
#include <drm/drm_mode.h>
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 07:33:22PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Andy,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, Feb 05, 2020 at 11:32:26AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
This file doesn't need everything provided by <linux/kernel.h>. All it needs are some types, which are provided by <linux/types.h>.
Note, <drm/drm_mode.h> already includes <linux/types.h>, but not relying on implicit includes is indeed a good thing.
Do we even need linux/types.h ? Apart from struct drm_mode_modeinfo, shmob_drm.h seems to only contain plain C without using any externally defined types.
Good point. It doesn't contain neither bool nor uXX or alike types. Probably we may simple drop the inclusion. I'll send v3.
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org