Clamping a value between INT_MIN and INT_MAX always return the value itself and generate warnings when compiling with W=1.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard benjamin.gaignard@st.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c index b8363aaa9032..681f1fd09357 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src), drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
- src->x1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x2 - new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX); + src->x1 = src->x2 - new_src_w; dst->x1 = clip->x1; } diff = clip->y1 - dst->y1; @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src), drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
- src->y1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y2 - new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX); + src->y1 = src->y2 - new_src_h; dst->y1 = clip->y1; } diff = dst->x2 - clip->x2; @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src), drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
- src->x2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x1 + new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX); + src->x2 = src->x1 + new_src_w; dst->x2 = clip->x2; } diff = dst->y2 - clip->y2; @@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src), drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
- src->y2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y1 + new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX); + src->y2 = src->y1 + new_src_h; dst->y2 = clip->y2; }
On Tue, 19 Nov 2019, Benjamin Gaignard benjamin.gaignard@st.com wrote:
Clamping a value between INT_MIN and INT_MAX always return the value itself and generate warnings when compiling with W=1.
Does that hold for 32-bit too?
BR, Jani.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard benjamin.gaignard@st.com
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c index b8363aaa9032..681f1fd09357 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src), drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
src->x1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x2 - new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
dst->x1 = clip->x1; } diff = clip->y1 - dst->y1;src->x1 = src->x2 - new_src_w;
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src), drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
src->y1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y2 - new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
dst->y1 = clip->y1; } diff = dst->x2 - clip->x2;src->y1 = src->y2 - new_src_h;
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src), drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
src->x2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x1 + new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
dst->x2 = clip->x2; } diff = dst->y2 - clip->y2;src->x2 = src->x1 + new_src_w;
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src), drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
src->y2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y1 + new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
dst->y2 = clip->y2; }src->y2 = src->y1 + new_src_h;
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 02:34:35PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
Clamping a value between INT_MIN and INT_MAX always return the value itself and generate warnings when compiling with W=1.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard benjamin.gaignard@st.com
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c index b8363aaa9032..681f1fd09357 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src), drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
Hmm. I think we borked this a bit when introducing clip_scaled(). 'diff' can exceed dst width here so clip_scaled() should be able to return a negative value.
Probably we should make this more consistent and do something like: diff = clip->x1 - dst->x1; if (diff > 0) { - u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src), - drm_rect_width(dst), diff); + int dst_w, new_src_w;
- src->x1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x2 - new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX); - dst->x1 = clip->x1; + dst_w = drm_rect_width(dst); + diff = min(diff, dst_w); + new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src), dst_w, diff); + + src->x1 = src->x2 - new_src_w; + dst->x1 += diff; }
etc.
src->x1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x2 - new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
dst->x1 = clip->x1; } diff = clip->y1 - dst->y1;src->x1 = src->x2 - new_src_w;
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src), drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
src->y1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y2 - new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
dst->y1 = clip->y1; } diff = dst->x2 - clip->x2;src->y1 = src->y2 - new_src_h;
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src), drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
src->x2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x1 + new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
dst->x2 = clip->x2; } diff = dst->y2 - clip->y2;src->x2 = src->x1 + new_src_w;
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src), drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
src->y2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y1 + new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
dst->y2 = clip->y2; }src->y2 = src->y1 + new_src_h;
-- 2.15.0
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 05:22:34PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 02:34:35PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
Clamping a value between INT_MIN and INT_MAX always return the value itself and generate warnings when compiling with W=1.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard benjamin.gaignard@st.com
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c index b8363aaa9032..681f1fd09357 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src), drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
Hmm. I think we borked this a bit when introducing clip_scaled(). 'diff' can exceed dst width here so clip_scaled() should be able to return a negative value.
Probably we should make this more consistent and do something like: diff = clip->x1 - dst->x1; if (diff > 0) {
u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src),
drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
int dst_w, new_src_w;
src->x1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x2 - new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
dst->x1 = clip->x1;
dst_w = drm_rect_width(dst);
diff = min(diff, dst_w);
new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src), dst_w, diff);
src->x1 = src->x2 - new_src_w;
dst->x1 += diff; }
etc.
I tried to refine that a bit more and sent it out as two patches.
src->x1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x2 - new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
dst->x1 = clip->x1; } diff = clip->y1 - dst->y1;src->x1 = src->x2 - new_src_w;
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src), drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
src->y1 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y2 - new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
dst->y1 = clip->y1; } diff = dst->x2 - clip->x2;src->y1 = src->y2 - new_src_h;
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_w = clip_scaled(drm_rect_width(src), drm_rect_width(dst), diff);
src->x2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->x1 + new_src_w, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
dst->x2 = clip->x2; } diff = dst->y2 - clip->y2;src->x2 = src->x1 + new_src_w;
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ bool drm_rect_clip_scaled(struct drm_rect *src, struct drm_rect *dst, u32 new_src_h = clip_scaled(drm_rect_height(src), drm_rect_height(dst), diff);
src->y2 = clamp_t(int64_t, src->y1 + new_src_h, INT_MIN, INT_MAX);
dst->y2 = clip->y2; }src->y2 = src->y1 + new_src_h;
-- 2.15.0
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
-- Ville Syrjälä Intel
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org