The comment for intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler() is not consistent with the code and the rest of the comment for this routine. This patch fixes this typo in comment.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Amit Mehta gmate.amit@gmail.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c index 77af512..04e248d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ bool intel_set_pch_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, }
/** - * intel_pch_fifo_underrun_irq_handler - handle PCH fifo underrun interrupt + * intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler - handle CPU fifo underrun interrupt * @dev_priv: i915 device instance * @pipe: (CPU) pipe to set state for *
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Kumar Amit Mehta gmate.amit@gmail.com wrote:
The comment for intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler() is not consistent with the code and the rest of the comment for this routine. This patch fixes this typo in comment.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Amit Mehta gmate.amit@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula jani.nikula@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c index 77af512..04e248d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_fifo_underrun.c @@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ bool intel_set_pch_fifo_underrun_reporting(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, }
/**
- intel_pch_fifo_underrun_irq_handler - handle PCH fifo underrun interrupt
- intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler - handle CPU fifo underrun interrupt
- @dev_priv: i915 device instance
- @pipe: (CPU) pipe to set state for
-- 2.1.0
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 09:56:49AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015, Kumar Amit Mehta gmate.amit@gmail.com wrote:
The comment for intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler() is not consistent with the code and the rest of the comment for this routine. This patch fixes this typo in comment.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Amit Mehta gmate.amit@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula jani.nikula@intel.com
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org