Document the newly added PMI8994 compatible.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio konrad.dybcio@somainline.org --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml index 47938e372987..d839e75d9788 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties: compatible: enum: - qcom,pm8941-wled + - qcom,pmi8994-wled - qcom,pmi8998-wled - qcom,pm660l-wled - qcom,pm8150l-wled
Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio konrad.dybcio@somainline.org --- drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c index 3bc7800eb0a9..497b9035a908 100644 --- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c @@ -1704,6 +1704,7 @@ static int wled_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static const struct of_device_id wled_match_table[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,pm8941-wled", .data = (void *)3 }, + { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pm660l-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pm8150l-wled", .data = (void *)5 },
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson@linaro.org
Daniel.
drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c index 3bc7800eb0a9..497b9035a908 100644 --- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c @@ -1704,6 +1704,7 @@ static int wled_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static const struct of_device_id wled_match_table[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,pm8941-wled", .data = (void *)3 },
- { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pm660l-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pm8150l-wled", .data = (void *)5 },
-- 2.30.1
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson@linaro.org
Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?
drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c index 3bc7800eb0a9..497b9035a908 100644 --- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c @@ -1704,6 +1704,7 @@ static int wled_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static const struct of_device_id wled_match_table[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,pm8941-wled", .data = (void *)3 },
- { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pm660l-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pm8150l-wled", .data = (void *)5 },
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 08:39:35AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson@linaro.org
Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?
Simply an oversight. Looks like I forgot to remove it from my backlog when it was applied.
Daniel.
drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c index 3bc7800eb0a9..497b9035a908 100644 --- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c @@ -1704,6 +1704,7 @@ static int wled_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static const struct of_device_id wled_match_table[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,pm8941-wled", .data = (void *)3 },
- { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pm660l-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pm8150l-wled", .data = (void *)5 },
-- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
On Tue, 23 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 08:39:35AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson@linaro.org
Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?
Simply an oversight. Looks like I forgot to remove it from my backlog when it was applied.
I wondered if I'd made a mistake.
No problem. Thanks for the clarification.
drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c index 3bc7800eb0a9..497b9035a908 100644 --- a/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c +++ b/drivers/video/backlight/qcom-wled.c @@ -1704,6 +1704,7 @@ static int wled_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static const struct of_device_id wled_match_table[] = { { .compatible = "qcom,pm8941-wled", .data = (void *)3 },
- { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8994-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pm660l-wled", .data = (void *)4 }, { .compatible = "qcom,pm8150l-wled", .data = (void *)5 },
Hi Lee,
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:40 AM Lee Jones lee.jones@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson@linaro.org
Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?
Only 12 days later?!?
It's not uncommon to receive acks for patches after they have been applied upstream. But it is if the patch was applied 10 years and 9 months ago! https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k/F5513AE92A5A1047AC2F91AEBB9202680288CBBA3...
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
On Wed, 24 Mar 2021, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Lee,
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:40 AM Lee Jones lee.jones@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, 22 Mar 2021, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:05PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Add a compatible for PMI8994 WLED. It uses the V4 of WLED IP.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson@linaro.org
Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?
Only 12 days later?!?
It's not uncommon to receive acks for patches after they have been applied upstream. But it is if the patch was applied 10 years and 9 months ago! https://lore.kernel.org/linux-m68k/F5513AE92A5A1047AC2F91AEBB9202680288CBBA3...
That truly is next level! :)
Hi,
Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?
Forgive me if it turns out I'm blind, but I can't see the patch being in either -next, backlight/for-next, or 5.13-rc3. Perhaps it was omitted after all?
Konrad
On Thu, 27 May 2021, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Hi,
Why are you Reviewing/Acking a patch that was applied on the 10th?
Forgive me if it turns out I'm blind, but I can't see the patch being in either -next, backlight/for-next, or 5.13-rc3. Perhaps it was omitted after all?
Interesting. It's not you, it's me!
No idea what happened exactly TBH, but it's applied again.
Should be in -next tomorrow. Apologies for the delay.
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 13:41:04 +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Document the newly added PMI8994 compatible.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
Acked-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org
On Sun, 28 Feb 2021, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Document the newly added PMI8994 compatible.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
Applied, thanks.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 01:41:04PM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
Document the newly added PMI8994 compatible.
Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio konrad.dybcio@somainline.org
(For Lee) Acked-by: Daniel Thompson daniel.thompson@linaro.org
Daniel.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml index 47938e372987..d839e75d9788 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/backlight/qcom-wled.yaml @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ properties: compatible: enum: - qcom,pm8941-wled
- qcom,pmi8994-wled - qcom,pmi8998-wled - qcom,pm660l-wled - qcom,pm8150l-wled
-- 2.30.1
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org