Using wake_up_process() is more simpler and friendly, and it is more convenient for analysis and statistics
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing wangqing@vivo.com --- drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c index 7475e09..de51326 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ dma_fence_default_wait_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb) struct default_wait_cb *wait = container_of(cb, struct default_wait_cb, base);
- wake_up_state(wait->task, TASK_NORMAL); + wake_up_process(wait->task); }
/**
Am 19.03.21 um 03:58 schrieb Wang Qing:
Using wake_up_process() is more simpler and friendly, and it is more convenient for analysis and statistics
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing wangqing@vivo.com
Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
Should I pick it up or do you want to push it through some other tree than DRM?
Thanks, Christian.
drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c index 7475e09..de51326 --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-fence.c @@ -655,7 +655,7 @@ dma_fence_default_wait_cb(struct dma_fence *fence, struct dma_fence_cb *cb) struct default_wait_cb *wait = container_of(cb, struct default_wait_cb, base);
- wake_up_state(wait->task, TASK_NORMAL);
wake_up_process(wait->task); }
/**
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Christian König -
Wang Qing