The "if (pass_size > buf->total)" can underflow so I have changed the type of size and pass_size to unsigned to avoid this problem.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com --- This code is on the way out, but whatever. I may as well send this patch since I already wrote the patch.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c index 09e3f39..98f9ada 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c @@ -2483,7 +2483,7 @@ int r600_cp_dispatch_texture(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_buf *buf; u32 *buffer; const u8 __user *data; - int size, pass_size; + unsigned int size, pass_size; u64 src_offset, dst_offset;
if (!radeon_check_offset(dev_priv, tex->offset)) {
On 03.07.2015 10:54, Dan Carpenter wrote:
The "if (pass_size > buf->total)" can underflow so I have changed the type of size and pass_size to unsigned to avoid this problem.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com
Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
This code is on the way out, but whatever. I may as well send this patch since I already wrote the patch.
Yeah, indeed but it will still take a while until we can really remove it.
Well, maybe it's time to give it a try.
Regards, Christian.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c index 09e3f39..98f9ada 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c @@ -2483,7 +2483,7 @@ int r600_cp_dispatch_texture(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_buf *buf; u32 *buffer; const u8 __user *data;
- int size, pass_size;
unsigned int size, pass_size; u64 src_offset, dst_offset;
if (!radeon_check_offset(dev_priv, tex->offset)) {
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com wrote:
On 03.07.2015 10:54, Dan Carpenter wrote:
The "if (pass_size > buf->total)" can underflow so I have changed the type of size and pass_size to unsigned to avoid this problem.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpenter@oracle.com
Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
Applied. thanks.
This code is on the way out, but whatever. I may as well send this patch since I already wrote the patch.
Yeah, indeed but it will still take a while until we can really remove it.
Well, maybe it's time to give it a try.
I think it's probably about time. IIRC, intel already dropped UMS support.
Alex
Regards, Christian.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c index 09e3f39..98f9ada 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600_cp.c @@ -2483,7 +2483,7 @@ int r600_cp_dispatch_texture(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_buf *buf; u32 *buffer; const u8 __user *data;
int size, pass_size;
unsigned int size, pass_size; u64 src_offset, dst_offset; if (!radeon_check_offset(dev_priv, tex->offset)) {
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org