The branches of the "if" statement are the same. So remove the unnecessary if and goto statements.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1456916 ("Identical code for different branches") Fixes: 4c283fdac08ab ("drm/amd/display: Add HDCP module") Signed-off-by: Len Baker len.baker@gmx.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp1_execution.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp1_execution.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp1_execution.c index de872e7958b0..d0c565567102 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp1_execution.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp1_execution.c @@ -305,10 +305,8 @@ static enum mod_hdcp_status wait_for_ready(struct mod_hdcp *hdcp, hdcp, "bcaps_read")) goto out; } - if (!mod_hdcp_execute_and_set(check_ksv_ready, - &input->ready_check, &status, - hdcp, "ready_check")) - goto out; + mod_hdcp_execute_and_set(check_ksv_ready, &input->ready_check, &status, + hdcp, "ready_check"); out: return status; } -- 2.25.1
On Sun, 2021-07-11 at 19:24 +0200, Len Baker wrote:
The branches of the "if" statement are the same. So remove the unnecessary if and goto statements.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1456916 ("Identical code for different branches") Fixes: 4c283fdac08ab ("drm/amd/display: Add HDCP module") Signed-off-by: Len Baker len.baker@gmx.com
I'm not a big fan of this type of change.
It's currently the same style used for six tests in this function and changing this last one would just make it harder to see the code blocks as consistent.
I doubt any reasonable compiler would produce different objects.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp1_execution.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp1_execution.c
[]
@@ -305,10 +305,8 @@ static enum mod_hdcp_status wait_for_ready(struct mod_hdcp *hdcp, hdcp, "bcaps_read")) goto out; }
- if (!mod_hdcp_execute_and_set(check_ksv_ready,
&input->ready_check, &status,hdcp, "ready_check"))goto out;
- mod_hdcp_execute_and_set(check_ksv_ready, &input->ready_check, &status,
hdcp, "ready_check");out: return status; } -- 2.25.1
On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 10:45:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
On Sun, 2021-07-11 at 19:24 +0200, Len Baker wrote:
The branches of the "if" statement are the same. So remove the unnecessary if and goto statements.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1456916 ("Identical code for different branches") Fixes: 4c283fdac08ab ("drm/amd/display: Add HDCP module") Signed-off-by: Len Baker len.baker@gmx.com
I'm not a big fan of this type of change.
It's currently the same style used for six tests in this function and changing this last one would just make it harder to see the code blocks as consistent.
I doubt any reasonable compiler would produce different objects.
Ok, thanks for the review. I leave it as is.
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp1_execution.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/modules/hdcp/hdcp1_execution.c
[]
@@ -305,10 +305,8 @@ static enum mod_hdcp_status wait_for_ready(struct mod_hdcp *hdcp, hdcp, "bcaps_read")) goto out; }
- if (!mod_hdcp_execute_and_set(check_ksv_ready,
&input->ready_check, &status,hdcp, "ready_check"))goto out;
- mod_hdcp_execute_and_set(check_ksv_ready, &input->ready_check, &status,
hdcp, "ready_check");out: return status; } -- 2.25.1
Thanks, Len
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Joe Perches -
Len Baker