This eliminates the following sparse warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c:527:5: warning: symbol 'analogix_dp_start_aux_transaction' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot hulkci@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jason Yan yanaijie@huawei.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c index 914c569ab8c1..fafb4b492ea0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ void analogix_dp_enable_sw_function(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) writel(reg, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_FUNC_EN_1); }
-int analogix_dp_start_aux_transaction(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) +static int analogix_dp_start_aux_transaction(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) { int reg; int retval = 0;
ping...
在 2020/9/12 11:38, Jason Yan 写道:
This eliminates the following sparse warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c:527:5: warning: symbol 'analogix_dp_start_aux_transaction' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot hulkci@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jason Yan yanaijie@huawei.com
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c index 914c569ab8c1..fafb4b492ea0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ void analogix_dp_enable_sw_function(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) writel(reg, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_FUNC_EN_1); }
-int analogix_dp_start_aux_transaction(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) +static int analogix_dp_start_aux_transaction(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) { int reg; int retval = 0;
Hi Jason.
Thanks, also applied to drm-misc-next. If you had other drm/fbdev related patches pending then I have missed them so please resend.
Sam
On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 11:38:43AM +0800, Jason Yan wrote:
This eliminates the following sparse warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c:527:5: warning: symbol 'analogix_dp_start_aux_transaction' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot hulkci@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jason Yan yanaijie@huawei.com
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c index 914c569ab8c1..fafb4b492ea0 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_reg.c @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ void analogix_dp_enable_sw_function(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) writel(reg, dp->reg_base + ANALOGIX_DP_FUNC_EN_1); }
-int analogix_dp_start_aux_transaction(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) +static int analogix_dp_start_aux_transaction(struct analogix_dp_device *dp) { int reg; int retval = 0; -- 2.25.4
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Jason Yan -
Sam Ravnborg