This patch replaces list_entry with list_first_entry as it makes the code more clear. Done using coccinelle:
@@ expression e; @@ ( - list_entry(e->next, + list_first_entry(e, ...) | - list_entry(e->prev, + list_last_entry(e, ...) )
Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c index 3144400..646f593 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void amdgpu_sa_bo_try_free(struct amdgpu_sa_manager *sa_manager) if (sa_manager->hole->next == &sa_manager->olist) return;
- sa_bo = list_entry(sa_manager->hole->next, struct amdgpu_sa_bo, olist); + sa_bo = list_first_entry(sa_manager->hole, struct amdgpu_sa_bo, olist); list_for_each_entry_safe_from(sa_bo, tmp, &sa_manager->olist, olist) { if (sa_bo->fence == NULL || !dma_fence_is_signaled(sa_bo->fence)) { @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static inline unsigned amdgpu_sa_bo_hole_eoffset(struct amdgpu_sa_manager *sa_ma struct list_head *hole = sa_manager->hole;
if (hole->next != &sa_manager->olist) { - return list_entry(hole->next, struct amdgpu_sa_bo, olist)->soffset; + return list_first_entry(hole, struct amdgpu_sa_bo, olist)->soffset; } return sa_manager->size; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c index 0c9480b..fb9ecae 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c @@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ struct omap_dss_device *omap_dss_get_next_device(struct omap_dss_device *from) goto out; }
- dssdev = list_entry(l->next, struct omap_dss_device, - panel_list); + dssdev = list_first_entry(l, struct omap_dss_device, + panel_list); omap_dss_get_device(dssdev); goto out; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c index 197b157..66c0482 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void radeon_sa_bo_try_free(struct radeon_sa_manager *sa_manager) if (sa_manager->hole->next == &sa_manager->olist) return;
- sa_bo = list_entry(sa_manager->hole->next, struct radeon_sa_bo, olist); + sa_bo = list_first_entry(sa_manager->hole, struct radeon_sa_bo, olist); list_for_each_entry_safe_from(sa_bo, tmp, &sa_manager->olist, olist) { if (sa_bo->fence == NULL || !radeon_fence_signaled(sa_bo->fence)) { return; @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static inline unsigned radeon_sa_bo_hole_eoffset(struct radeon_sa_manager *sa_ma struct list_head *hole = sa_manager->hole;
if (hole->next != &sa_manager->olist) { - return list_entry(hole->next, struct radeon_sa_bo, olist)->soffset; + return list_first_entry(hole, struct radeon_sa_bo, olist)->soffset; } return sa_manager->size; }
Mhm, actually that patch isn't correct. What we grab get here is the next entry, not the first one.
We don't have an alias list_next_entry for list_first_entry?
Regards, Christian.
Am 18.03.2018 um 22:51 schrieb Arushi Singhal:
This patch replaces list_entry with list_first_entry as it makes the code more clear. Done using coccinelle:
@@ expression e; @@ (
- list_entry(e->next,
- list_first_entry(e, ...)
|
- list_entry(e->prev,
- list_last_entry(e, ...)
)
Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c index 3144400..646f593 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void amdgpu_sa_bo_try_free(struct amdgpu_sa_manager *sa_manager) if (sa_manager->hole->next == &sa_manager->olist) return;
- sa_bo = list_entry(sa_manager->hole->next, struct amdgpu_sa_bo, olist);
- sa_bo = list_first_entry(sa_manager->hole, struct amdgpu_sa_bo, olist); list_for_each_entry_safe_from(sa_bo, tmp, &sa_manager->olist, olist) { if (sa_bo->fence == NULL || !dma_fence_is_signaled(sa_bo->fence)) {
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static inline unsigned amdgpu_sa_bo_hole_eoffset(struct amdgpu_sa_manager *sa_ma struct list_head *hole = sa_manager->hole;
if (hole->next != &sa_manager->olist) {
return list_entry(hole->next, struct amdgpu_sa_bo, olist)->soffset;
return list_first_entry(hole, struct amdgpu_sa_bo, olist)->soffset;diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c index 0c9480b..fb9ecae 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c @@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ struct omap_dss_device *omap_dss_get_next_device(struct omap_dss_device *from) goto out; }
dssdev = list_entry(l->next, struct omap_dss_device,panel_list);
dssdev = list_first_entry(l, struct omap_dss_device,panel_list); omap_dss_get_device(dssdev); goto out;diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c index 197b157..66c0482 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void radeon_sa_bo_try_free(struct radeon_sa_manager *sa_manager) if (sa_manager->hole->next == &sa_manager->olist) return;
- sa_bo = list_entry(sa_manager->hole->next, struct radeon_sa_bo, olist);
- sa_bo = list_first_entry(sa_manager->hole, struct radeon_sa_bo, olist); list_for_each_entry_safe_from(sa_bo, tmp, &sa_manager->olist, olist) { if (sa_bo->fence == NULL || !radeon_fence_signaled(sa_bo->fence)) { return;
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static inline unsigned radeon_sa_bo_hole_eoffset(struct radeon_sa_manager *sa_ma struct list_head *hole = sa_manager->hole;
if (hole->next != &sa_manager->olist) {
return list_entry(hole->next, struct radeon_sa_bo, olist)->soffset;
return list_first_entry(hole, struct radeon_sa_bo, olist)->soffset;
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Christian König wrote:
Mhm, actually that patch isn't correct. What we grab get here is the next entry, not the first one.
We don't have an alias list_next_entry for list_first_entry?
As compared to the semantic patch I proposed earlier today, it would seem that list_first_entry is useful when the types are different? One would have to check the result of course, but a list eleemnt with the same type as the structure that contains the list might be unlikely?
julia
Regards, Christian.
Am 18.03.2018 um 22:51 schrieb Arushi Singhal:
This patch replaces list_entry with list_first_entry as it makes the code more clear. Done using coccinelle:
@@ expression e; @@ (
- list_entry(e->next,
- list_first_entry(e, ...)
|
- list_entry(e->prev,
- list_last_entry(e, ...)
)
Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c index 3144400..646f593 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void amdgpu_sa_bo_try_free(struct amdgpu_sa_manager *sa_manager) if (sa_manager->hole->next == &sa_manager->olist) return;
- sa_bo = list_entry(sa_manager->hole->next, struct amdgpu_sa_bo,
olist);
- sa_bo = list_first_entry(sa_manager->hole, struct amdgpu_sa_bo,
olist); list_for_each_entry_safe_from(sa_bo, tmp, &sa_manager->olist, olist) { if (sa_bo->fence == NULL || !dma_fence_is_signaled(sa_bo->fence)) { @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static inline unsigned amdgpu_sa_bo_hole_eoffset(struct amdgpu_sa_manager *sa_ma struct list_head *hole = sa_manager->hole; if (hole->next != &sa_manager->olist) {
return list_entry(hole->next, struct amdgpu_sa_bo,olist)->soffset;
return list_first_entry(hole, struct amdgpu_sa_bo,olist)->soffset; } return sa_manager->size; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c index 0c9480b..fb9ecae 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c @@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ struct omap_dss_device *omap_dss_get_next_device(struct omap_dss_device *from) goto out; }
dssdev = list_entry(l->next, struct omap_dss_device,panel_list);
dssdev = list_first_entry(l, struct omap_dss_device,panel_list); omap_dss_get_device(dssdev); goto out;diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c index 197b157..66c0482 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void radeon_sa_bo_try_free(struct radeon_sa_manager *sa_manager) if (sa_manager->hole->next == &sa_manager->olist) return;
- sa_bo = list_entry(sa_manager->hole->next, struct radeon_sa_bo,
olist);
- sa_bo = list_first_entry(sa_manager->hole, struct radeon_sa_bo,
olist); list_for_each_entry_safe_from(sa_bo, tmp, &sa_manager->olist, olist) { if (sa_bo->fence == NULL || !radeon_fence_signaled(sa_bo->fence)) { return; @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static inline unsigned radeon_sa_bo_hole_eoffset(struct radeon_sa_manager *sa_ma struct list_head *hole = sa_manager->hole; if (hole->next != &sa_manager->olist) {
return list_entry(hole->next, struct radeon_sa_bo,olist)->soffset;
return list_first_entry(hole, struct radeon_sa_bo,olist)->soffset; } return sa_manager->size; }
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/8b1e22f8-7a05-b66b-8825-7.... For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Am 19.03.2018 um 12:06 schrieb Julia Lawall:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018, Christian König wrote:
Mhm, actually that patch isn't correct. What we grab get here is the next entry, not the first one.
We don't have an alias list_next_entry for list_first_entry?
As compared to the semantic patch I proposed earlier today, it would seem that list_first_entry is useful when the types are different? One would have to check the result of course, but a list eleemnt with the same type as the structure that contains the list might be unlikely?
The list element and the list head have different types in this case:
if (sa_manager->hole->next == &sa_manager->olist) return;
- sa_bo = list_entry(sa_manager->hole->next, struct amdgpu_sa_bo, olist);
- sa_bo = list_first_entry(sa_manager->hole, struct amdgpu_sa_bo, olist);
sa_manager->olist is the head of the list and sa_manager->hole can point to both the head and any element in the list.
The statement "if (sa_manager->hole->next == &sa_manager->olist)" now checks if the next pointer points to the head and if so aborts the function.
Then the statement "sa_bo = list_entry(sa_manager->hole->next, struct amdgpu_sa_bo, olist);" returns the next element after the hole to try to release it.
So with the automated change the code is still correct, but NOT easier to understand because we actually don't grab the first element here.
Regards, Christian.
julia
Regards, Christian.
Am 18.03.2018 um 22:51 schrieb Arushi Singhal:
This patch replaces list_entry with list_first_entry as it makes the code more clear. Done using coccinelle:
@@ expression e; @@ (
- list_entry(e->next,
- list_first_entry(e, ...)
|
- list_entry(e->prev,
- list_last_entry(e, ...)
)
Signed-off-by: Arushi Singhal arushisinghal19971997@gmail.com
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c index 3144400..646f593 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sa.c @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void amdgpu_sa_bo_try_free(struct amdgpu_sa_manager *sa_manager) if (sa_manager->hole->next == &sa_manager->olist) return;
- sa_bo = list_entry(sa_manager->hole->next, struct amdgpu_sa_bo,
olist);
- sa_bo = list_first_entry(sa_manager->hole, struct amdgpu_sa_bo,
olist); list_for_each_entry_safe_from(sa_bo, tmp, &sa_manager->olist, olist) { if (sa_bo->fence == NULL || !dma_fence_is_signaled(sa_bo->fence)) { @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static inline unsigned amdgpu_sa_bo_hole_eoffset(struct amdgpu_sa_manager *sa_ma struct list_head *hole = sa_manager->hole; if (hole->next != &sa_manager->olist) {
return list_entry(hole->next, struct amdgpu_sa_bo,olist)->soffset;
return list_first_entry(hole, struct amdgpu_sa_bo,olist)->soffset; } return sa_manager->size; } diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c index 0c9480b..fb9ecae 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/display.c @@ -158,8 +158,8 @@ struct omap_dss_device *omap_dss_get_next_device(struct omap_dss_device *from) goto out; }
dssdev = list_entry(l->next, struct omap_dss_device,panel_list);
dssdev = list_first_entry(l, struct omap_dss_device,panel_list); omap_dss_get_device(dssdev); goto out; }diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c index 197b157..66c0482 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_sa.c @@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static void radeon_sa_bo_try_free(struct radeon_sa_manager *sa_manager) if (sa_manager->hole->next == &sa_manager->olist) return;
- sa_bo = list_entry(sa_manager->hole->next, struct radeon_sa_bo,
olist);
- sa_bo = list_first_entry(sa_manager->hole, struct radeon_sa_bo,
olist); list_for_each_entry_safe_from(sa_bo, tmp, &sa_manager->olist, olist) { if (sa_bo->fence == NULL || !radeon_fence_signaled(sa_bo->fence)) { return; @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static inline unsigned radeon_sa_bo_hole_eoffset(struct radeon_sa_manager *sa_ma struct list_head *hole = sa_manager->hole; if (hole->next != &sa_manager->olist) {
return list_entry(hole->next, struct radeon_sa_bo,olist)->soffset;
return list_first_entry(hole, struct radeon_sa_bo,olist)->soffset; } return sa_manager->size; }
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "outreachy-kernel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to outreachy-kernel+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/outreachy-kernel/8b1e22f8-7a05-b66b-8825-7.... For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Arushi Singhal -
Christian König -
Julia Lawall