All of CI is just failing with the following, which prevents loading of the module:
i915 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* Scratch setup failed
Best guess is that this comes from the pin_map() for the scratch page, which does an i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence() somewhere. It looks like this now calls into dma_resv_wait_timeout() which can return the remaining timeout, leading to the caller thinking this is an error.
v2(Lucas): handle ret == 0
Fixes: 1d7f5e6c5240 ("drm/i915: drop bo->moving dependency") Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld matthew.auld@intel.com Cc: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Cc: Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi@intel.com Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com #v1 --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c index 2998d895a6b3..747ac65e060f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c @@ -772,9 +772,16 @@ int i915_gem_object_get_moving_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool intr) { + long ret; + assert_object_held(obj); - return dma_resv_wait_timeout(obj->base. resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL, - intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT); + + ret = dma_resv_wait_timeout(obj->base. resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL, + intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT); + if (!ret) + ret = -ETIME; + + return ret < 0 ? ret : 0; }
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
Am 08.04.22 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:
All of CI is just failing with the following, which prevents loading of the module:
i915 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* Scratch setup failed
Best guess is that this comes from the pin_map() for the scratch page, which does an i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence() somewhere. It looks like this now calls into dma_resv_wait_timeout() which can return the remaining timeout, leading to the caller thinking this is an error.
v2(Lucas): handle ret == 0
Fixes: 1d7f5e6c5240 ("drm/i915: drop bo->moving dependency") Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld matthew.auld@intel.com Cc: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Cc: Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi@intel.com Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com #v1
Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
Should I push it to drm-misc-next?
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c index 2998d895a6b3..747ac65e060f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c @@ -772,9 +772,16 @@ int i915_gem_object_get_moving_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool intr) {
- long ret;
- assert_object_held(obj);
- return dma_resv_wait_timeout(obj->base. resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL,
intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
ret = dma_resv_wait_timeout(obj->base. resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL,
intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
if (!ret)
ret = -ETIME;
return ret < 0 ? ret : 0; }
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
On 08/04/2022 09:59, Christian König wrote:
Am 08.04.22 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:
All of CI is just failing with the following, which prevents loading of the module:
i915 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* Scratch setup failed
Best guess is that this comes from the pin_map() for the scratch page, which does an i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence() somewhere. It looks like this now calls into dma_resv_wait_timeout() which can return the remaining timeout, leading to the caller thinking this is an error.
v2(Lucas): handle ret == 0
Fixes: 1d7f5e6c5240 ("drm/i915: drop bo->moving dependency") Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld matthew.auld@intel.com Cc: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Cc: Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi@intel.com Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com #v1
Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
Should I push it to drm-misc-next?
I guess we need to wait for at least BAT result to come back. I will ping here, assuming that comes back green. Thanks.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c index 2998d895a6b3..747ac65e060f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c @@ -772,9 +772,16 @@ int i915_gem_object_get_moving_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool intr) { + long ret;
assert_object_held(obj); - return dma_resv_wait_timeout(obj->base. resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL, - intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ ret = dma_resv_wait_timeout(obj->base. resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL, + intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT); + if (!ret) + ret = -ETIME;
+ return ret < 0 ? ret : 0; } #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
On 08/04/2022 10:48, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 08/04/2022 09:59, Christian König wrote:
Am 08.04.22 um 10:42 schrieb Matthew Auld:
All of CI is just failing with the following, which prevents loading of the module:
i915 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* Scratch setup failed
Best guess is that this comes from the pin_map() for the scratch page, which does an i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence() somewhere. It looks like this now calls into dma_resv_wait_timeout() which can return the remaining timeout, leading to the caller thinking this is an error.
v2(Lucas): handle ret == 0
Fixes: 1d7f5e6c5240 ("drm/i915: drop bo->moving dependency") Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld matthew.auld@intel.com Cc: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Cc: Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi@intel.com Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com #v1
Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
Should I push it to drm-misc-next?
I guess we need to wait for at least BAT result to come back. I will ping here, assuming that comes back green. Thanks.
Ok, please go ahead with merging.
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c index 2998d895a6b3..747ac65e060f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_object.c @@ -772,9 +772,16 @@ int i915_gem_object_get_moving_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, int i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj, bool intr) { + long ret;
assert_object_held(obj); - return dma_resv_wait_timeout(obj->base. resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL, - intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+ ret = dma_resv_wait_timeout(obj->base. resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_KERNEL, + intr, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT); + if (!ret) + ret = -ETIME;
+ return ret < 0 ? ret : 0; } #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DRM_I915_SELFTEST)
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 09:42:05AM +0100, Matthew Auld wrote:
All of CI is just failing with the following, which prevents loading of the module:
i915 0000:03:00.0: [drm] *ERROR* Scratch setup failed
Best guess is that this comes from the pin_map() for the scratch page, which does an i915_gem_object_wait_moving_fence() somewhere. It looks like this now calls into dma_resv_wait_timeout() which can return the remaining timeout, leading to the caller thinking this is an error.
v2(Lucas): handle ret == 0
Fixes: 1d7f5e6c5240 ("drm/i915: drop bo->moving dependency") Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld matthew.auld@intel.com Cc: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Cc: Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi@intel.com Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Reviewed-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com #v1
For the record, patchwork is disabled at this time. Trybot is still up if you want CI to verify this.
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org