Notice that there is a *continue* statement in the middle of the for loop and that prevents the code below from ever being reached:
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false; goto done; }
Fix this by removing the continue statement and updating ring->sched.ready to true before calling amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring).
Notice that this fix is based on commit 1b61de45dfaf ("drm/amdgpu: add initial VCN2.0 support (v2)")
Addresses-Coverity-ID 1485608 ("Structurally dead code") Fixes: 28c17d72072b ("drm/amdgpu: add VCN2.5 basic supports") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com ---
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c index 395c2259f979..47b0dcd59e13 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle) adev->nbio_funcs->vcn_doorbell_range(adev, ring->use_doorbell, ring->doorbell_index, j);
+ ring->sched.ready = true; r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false; @@ -266,8 +267,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle)
for (i = 0; i < adev->vcn.num_enc_rings; ++i) { ring = &adev->vcn.inst[j].ring_enc[i]; - ring->sched.ready = false; - continue; + ring->sched.ready = true; r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false; @@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle) }
ring = &adev->vcn.inst[j].ring_jpeg; + ring->sched.ready = true; r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false;
On 2019-10-01 1:16 p.m., Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Notice that there is a *continue* statement in the middle of the for loop and that prevents the code below from ever being reached:
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false; goto done; }
Fix this by removing the continue statement and updating ring->sched.ready to true before calling amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring).
Notice that this fix is based on commit 1b61de45dfaf ("drm/amdgpu: add initial VCN2.0 support (v2)")
Addresses-Coverity-ID 1485608 ("Structurally dead code") Fixes: 28c17d72072b ("drm/amdgpu: add VCN2.5 basic supports") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c index 395c2259f979..47b0dcd59e13 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle) adev->nbio_funcs->vcn_doorbell_range(adev, ring->use_doorbell, ring->doorbell_index, j);
ring->sched.ready = true;
This is redundant. all the sched->ready is initialized as true, please refer to drm_sched_init()
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false;
@@ -266,8 +267,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle)
for (i = 0; i < adev->vcn.num_enc_rings; ++i) { ring = &adev->vcn.inst[j].ring_enc[i];
ring->sched.ready = false;
continue;
ring->sched.ready = true;
Because the VCN 2.5 FW still has issue for encode, so we have it disabled here.
Regards,
Leo
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false;
@@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle) }
ring = &adev->vcn.inst[j].ring_jpeg;
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false;ring->sched.ready = true;
Hi,
On 10/1/19 16:29, Liu, Leo wrote:
On 2019-10-01 1:16 p.m., Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Notice that there is a *continue* statement in the middle of the for loop and that prevents the code below from ever being reached:
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false; goto done; }
Fix this by removing the continue statement and updating ring->sched.ready to true before calling amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring).
Notice that this fix is based on commit 1b61de45dfaf ("drm/amdgpu: add initial VCN2.0 support (v2)")
Addresses-Coverity-ID 1485608 ("Structurally dead code") Fixes: 28c17d72072b ("drm/amdgpu: add VCN2.5 basic supports") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c index 395c2259f979..47b0dcd59e13 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle) adev->nbio_funcs->vcn_doorbell_range(adev, ring->use_doorbell, ring->doorbell_index, j);
ring->sched.ready = true;
This is redundant. all the sched->ready is initialized as true, please refer to drm_sched_init()
I see... so in the following commit 1b61de45dfaf ("drm/amdgpu: add initial VCN2.0 support (v2)") that line is also redundant?
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false;
@@ -266,8 +267,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle)
for (i = 0; i < adev->vcn.num_enc_rings; ++i) { ring = &adev->vcn.inst[j].ring_enc[i];
ring->sched.ready = false;
continue;
ring->sched.ready = true;
Because the VCN 2.5 FW still has issue for encode, so we have it disabled here.
OK. So, maybe we can add a comment pointing that out?
Thanks -- Gustavo
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false;
@@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle) }
ring = &adev->vcn.inst[j].ring_jpeg;
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false;ring->sched.ready = true;
On 2019-10-01 5:43 p.m., Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Hi,
On 10/1/19 16:29, Liu, Leo wrote:
On 2019-10-01 1:16 p.m., Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
Notice that there is a *continue* statement in the middle of the for loop and that prevents the code below from ever being reached:
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false; goto done; }
Fix this by removing the continue statement and updating ring->sched.ready to true before calling amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring).
Notice that this fix is based on commit 1b61de45dfaf ("drm/amdgpu: add initial VCN2.0 support (v2)")
Addresses-Coverity-ID 1485608 ("Structurally dead code") Fixes: 28c17d72072b ("drm/amdgpu: add VCN2.5 basic supports") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva gustavo@embeddedor.com
Any feedback is greatly appreciated.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c index 395c2259f979..47b0dcd59e13 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c @@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle) adev->nbio_funcs->vcn_doorbell_range(adev, ring->use_doorbell, ring->doorbell_index, j);
ring->sched.ready = true;
This is redundant. all the sched->ready is initialized as true, please refer to drm_sched_init()
I see... so in the following commit 1b61de45dfaf ("drm/amdgpu: add initial VCN2.0 support (v2)") that line is also redundant?
Yes.
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false;
@@ -266,8 +267,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle)
for (i = 0; i < adev->vcn.num_enc_rings; ++i) { ring = &adev->vcn.inst[j].ring_enc[i];
ring->sched.ready = false;
continue;
ring->sched.ready = true;
Because the VCN 2.5 FW still has issue for encode, so we have it disabled here.
OK. So, maybe we can add a comment pointing that out?
That could be better.
Thanks, Leo
Thanks
Gustavo
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false;
@@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle) }
ring = &adev->vcn.inst[j].ring_jpeg;
ring->sched.ready = true; r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false;
On 10/1/19 16:46, Liu, Leo wrote:
ring->sched.ready = true;
This is redundant. all the sched->ready is initialized as true, please refer to drm_sched_init()
I see... so in the following commit 1b61de45dfaf ("drm/amdgpu: add initial VCN2.0 support (v2)") that line is also redundant?
Yes.
OK.
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false;
@@ -266,8 +267,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle)
for (i = 0; i < adev->vcn.num_enc_rings; ++i) { ring = &adev->vcn.inst[j].ring_enc[i];
ring->sched.ready = false;
continue;
ring->sched.ready = true;
Because the VCN 2.5 FW still has issue for encode, so we have it disabled here.
OK. So, maybe we can add a comment pointing that out?
That could be better.
Great. I'm glad it's not a bug. I'll write a patch for that so other people don't waste time taking a look.
I appreciate your feedback. Thanks -- Gustavo
On 2019-10-01 5:57 p.m., Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
On 10/1/19 16:46, Liu, Leo wrote:
ring->sched.ready = true;
This is redundant. all the sched->ready is initialized as true, please refer to drm_sched_init()
I see... so in the following commit 1b61de45dfaf ("drm/amdgpu: add initial VCN2.0 support (v2)") that line is also redundant?
Yes.
OK.
r = amdgpu_ring_test_ring(ring); if (r) { ring->sched.ready = false;
@@ -266,8 +267,7 @@ static int vcn_v2_5_hw_init(void *handle)
for (i = 0; i < adev->vcn.num_enc_rings; ++i) { ring = &adev->vcn.inst[j].ring_enc[i];
ring->sched.ready = false;
continue;
ring->sched.ready = true;
Because the VCN 2.5 FW still has issue for encode, so we have it disabled here.
OK. So, maybe we can add a comment pointing that out?
That could be better.
Great. I'm glad it's not a bug. I'll write a patch for that so other people don't waste time taking a look.
Thanks, just sent two patches to add comment, and long with the patch to make VCN ring ready properly.
Leo
I appreciate your feedback. Thanks -- Gustavo
On 10/1/19 17:21, Liu, Leo wrote:
OK. So, maybe we can add a comment pointing that out?
That could be better.
Great. I'm glad it's not a bug. I'll write a patch for that so other people don't waste time taking a look.
Thanks, just sent two patches to add comment, and long with the patch to make VCN ring ready properly.
Awesome. Thank you. I would just add a commit log to this patch:
[PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu: add a comment to VCN 2.5 encode ring
I'd update the subject to: drm/amdgpu: add code comment in vcn_v2_5_hw_init and add this as a commit log: Add a comment to VCN 2.5 encode ring
Also, I think it's important to follow the process and CC all the people and lists below:
$ scripts/get_maintainer.pl --nokeywords --nogit --nogit-fallback drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/vcn_v2_5.c Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com (supporter:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS) "Christian König" christian.koenig@amd.com (supporter:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS) "David (ChunMing) Zhou" David1.Zhou@amd.com (supporter:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS) David Airlie airlied@linux.ie (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS) Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch (maintainer:DRM DRIVERS) amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org (open list:RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERS) dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org (open list:DRM DRIVERS) linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Thanks -- Gustavo
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org