On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 2:55 PM Sam Ravnborg sam@ravnborg.org wrote:

Hi Rob,

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 02:38:18PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:

...

'arm,rtsm-display' is a panel for Arm, Ltd. virtual platforms (e.g. FVP). The binding has been in use for a long time, but was never documented.

Some users and an example have a 'panel-dpi' compatible, but that's not needed without a 'panel-timing' node which none of the users have since commit 928faf5e3e8d ("arm64: dts: fvp: Remove panel timings"). The example does have a 'panel-timing' node, but it should not for the same reasons the node was removed in the dts files. So update the example in arm,pl11x.yaml to match the schema.

Cc: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org Cc: Robin Murphy robin.murphy@arm.com Cc: Andre Przywara andre.przywara@arm.com Signed-off-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org

---

.../bindings/display/arm,pl11x.yaml | 15 +------------- .../bindings/display/panel/panel-simple.yaml | 20 +++++++++++++------ 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/arm,pl11x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/arm,pl11x.yaml index b545c6d20325..6cc9045e5c68 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/arm,pl11x.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/arm,pl11x.yaml @@ -159,25 +159,12 @@ examples: };

 panel {

•    compatible = "arm,rtsm-display", "panel-dpi";
  

•    power-supply = <&vcc_supply>;
  

•    compatible = "arm,rtsm-display";
  
     port {
         clcd_panel: endpoint {
             remote-endpoint = <&clcd_pads>;
         };
     };
  

•    panel-timing {
  

•        clock-frequency = <25175000>;
  

•        hactive = <640>;
  

•        hback-porch = <40>;
  

•        hfront-porch = <24>;
  

•        hsync-len = <96>;
  

•        vactive = <480>;
  

•        vback-porch = <32>;
  

•        vfront-porch = <11>;
  

•        vsync-len = <2>;
  

•    };
  

  };

... diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-simple.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-simple.yaml index 21ba90c9fe33..97afd276c54a 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-simple.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-simple.yaml @@ -19,9 +19,6 @@ description: |

If the panel is more advanced a dedicated binding file is required.

-allOf:

• • $ref: panel-common.yaml#

properties:

compatible: @@ -35,6 +32,8 @@ properties: - ampire,am-480272h3tmqw-t01h # Ampire AM-800480R3TMQW-A1H 7.0" WVGA TFT LCD panel - ampire,am800480r3tmqwa1h

•    # Arm, Ltd. Virtual Platforms Display
  

•  - arm,rtsm-display
     # AU Optronics Corporation 10.1" WSVGA TFT LCD panel
   - auo,b101aw03
     # AU Optronics Corporation 10.1" WSVGA TFT LCD panel
  

@@ -340,9 +339,18 @@ properties:

additionalProperties: false

-required:

• • compatible
• • power-supply

+allOf:

• • $ref: panel-common.yaml#
• • if:

•  # Most 'simple' panels must have a single supply, but a virtual display does not
  

•  not:
  

•    properties:
  

•      compatible:
  

•        contains:
  

•          const: arm,rtsm-display
  

• then:

•  required:
  

•    - power-supply
  

Sorry, but I do not like this change. The beauty of panel-simple is that this is a collection of simple display with identical bindings because the HW is more or less the same (in general - not in details like size etc).

Any panels that requires more are pushed out to their own binding and for arm,rtsm-display that would be better.

But I require less...

It is not this single exceptions that bothers me, it is the many exceptions we will have in a few years from now.

Fair enough, I'll make it a separate file.

Rob