On Sep 15, 2011, at 12:54 AM, Francisco Jerez wrote:
I haven't checked if the rest still makes sense. 5/5 was about why a driver who requests a dri2 swaplimit change should be called back to confirm it is ok with the swaplimit change, which you said seems totally redundant, right?
Ok, so we talk specifically about 4/5, which was reviewed by all of us, i think non-controversial, and a simple addition of a dri2 swaplimit api.
Keith, what about that one for a start?
No. It just started as a private conversation with Jesse and "drifted" into this. cc'ing dri-devel, all that was said is in this mail.
-mario
********************************************************************* Mario Kleiner Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics Spemannstr. 38 72076 Tuebingen Germany
e-mail: mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de office: +49 (0)7071/601-1623 fax: +49 (0)7071/601-616 www: http://www.kyb.tuebingen.mpg.de/~kleinerm ********************************************************************* "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." (Richard Feynman)
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 01:31:00 +0200 Mario Kleiner mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de wrote:
What's the latest here? I still think we need the swap limit API...
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org