From: Rob Pearce rob@flitspace.org.uk
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce rob@flitspace.org.uk --- Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the D425KTW does have LVDS. According to Intel's documentation, the D410PTL and D410PLTW don't.
diff -uprN -X linux-3.11.4/Documentation/dontdiff linux-3.11.4/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c linux-3.11.4-ovs/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c --- linux-3.11.4/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c 2013-10-22 19:00:30.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-3.11.4-ovs/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c 2013-10-27 15:51:25.000000000 +0000 @@ -696,6 +696,22 @@ }, { .callback = intel_no_lvds_dmi_callback, + .ident = "Intel D410PT", + .matches = { + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Intel"), + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "D410PT"), + }, + }, + { + .callback = intel_no_lvds_dmi_callback, + .ident = "Intel D425KT", + .matches = { + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Intel"), + DMI_EXACT_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "D425KT"), + }, + }, + { + .callback = intel_no_lvds_dmi_callback, .ident = "Intel D510MO", .matches = { DMI_MATCH(DMI_SYS_VENDOR, "Intel"),
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +0000, Rob Pearce wrote:
From: Rob Pearce rob@flitspace.org.uk
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce rob@flitspace.org.uk
Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the D425KTW does have LVDS. According to Intel's documentation, the D410PTL and D410PLTW don't.
Any reason you don't want this in the stable tree as well?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 10:33:02AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +0000, Rob Pearce wrote:
From: Rob Pearce rob@flitspace.org.uk
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce rob@flitspace.org.uk
Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the D425KTW does have LVDS. According to Intel's documentation, the D410PTL and D410PLTW don't.
Any reason you don't want this in the stable tree as well?
None. Picked up for -fixes, thanks for the patch. Also I prefer the patch change log in the commit message proper and less screaming in the summary ;-) All fixed while applying. -Daniel
On 27/10/13 17:33, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +0000, Rob Pearce wrote:
From: Rob Pearce rob@flitspace.org.uk
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce rob@flitspace.org.uk
Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the D425KTW does have LVDS. According to Intel's documentation, the D410PTL and D410PLTW don't.
Any reason you don't want this in the stable tree as well?
No, should be in stable. Sorry, I'm obviously getting some etiquette wrong (this is the first patch I've submitted).
Cheers, Rob
On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +0000, Rob Pearce wrote:
From: Rob Pearce rob@flitspace.org.uk
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce rob@flitspace.org.uk
Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the D425KTW does have LVDS. According to Intel's documentation, the D410PTL and D410PLTW don't.
Any reason you don't want this in the stable tree as well?
Hi Greg,
pardon my ignorance, but I thought this was supposed to be the maintainer's call to make ? Did I get this wrong ?
Thanks, Guenter
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:35:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +0000, Rob Pearce wrote:
From: Rob Pearce rob@flitspace.org.uk
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce rob@flitspace.org.uk
Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the D425KTW does have LVDS. According to Intel's documentation, the D410PTL and D410PLTW don't.
Any reason you don't want this in the stable tree as well?
Hi Greg,
pardon my ignorance, but I thought this was supposed to be the maintainer's call to make ? Did I get this wrong ?
Maintainer occasionally fumble it, so it's better when the patch submitter also thinks about this. I can always change it when I disagree ;-) -Daniel
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
-
Daniel Vetter -
Greg KH -
Guenter Roeck -
Rob Pearce