This is a follow-up change to fix incorrectly used max link rate source capability at MST init time.
Change history:
v1: - Initial
v2: - Use local variabale for improved code readability - Fix the comment to point to the correct sub-directory
Nikola Cornij (1): drm/i915: Use the correct max source link rate for MST
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
[why] Previously used value was not safe to provide the correct value, i.e. it could be 0 if not not configured, leading to no MST on this platform.
[how] Do not use the value from BIOS, but from the structure populated at encoder initialization time.
Fixes: 98025a62cb00 ("drm/dp_mst: Use Extended Base Receiver Capability DPCD space") Signed-off-by: Nikola Cornij nikola.cornij@amd.com Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c index bf7f8487945c..3642d7578658 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c @@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_encoder_init(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, int conn_base_id) struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &dig_port->dp; enum port port = dig_port->base.port; int ret; - int bios_max_link_rate; + int max_source_rate = intel_dp->source_rates[intel_dp->num_source_rates - 1];
if (!HAS_DP_MST(i915) || intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) return 0; @@ -957,11 +957,11 @@ intel_dp_mst_encoder_init(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, int conn_base_id)
/* create encoders */ intel_dp_create_fake_mst_encoders(dig_port); - bios_max_link_rate = intel_bios_dp_max_link_rate(&dig_port->base); ret = drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, &i915->drm, &intel_dp->aux, 16, 3, (u8)dig_port->max_lanes, - (u8)(bios_max_link_rate / 27000), conn_base_id); + (u8)(max_source_rate / 27000), + conn_base_id); if (ret) return ret;
Alright - I had Ville double check this and give their A-B on IRC (I just need to fix the open coded link_rate_to_bw() here). Since this got broken on drm- misc-next I'm going to go ahead and push the fix there, since I'm not going to be around next Monday or Tuesday and I don't want to leave i915 broken in the interim. Sorry about the noise with this Jani!
As well - I'll get to fixing the dpcd unit usage once I get back on Wednesday (unless Nikola's already gotten to it by then) so we use KHz instead. Although as ville has pointed out, I think we should teach the topology manager to allow passing for the current link rate/lane count during state computation in the long term.
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 17:45 -0400, Nikola Cornij wrote:
[why] Previously used value was not safe to provide the correct value, i.e. it could be 0 if not not configured, leading to no MST on this platform.
[how] Do not use the value from BIOS, but from the structure populated at encoder initialization time.
Fixes: 98025a62cb00 ("drm/dp_mst: Use Extended Base Receiver Capability DPCD space") Signed-off-by: Nikola Cornij nikola.cornij@amd.com Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c index bf7f8487945c..3642d7578658 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c @@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_encoder_init(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, int conn_base_id) struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &dig_port->dp; enum port port = dig_port->base.port; int ret; - int bios_max_link_rate; + int max_source_rate = intel_dp->source_rates[intel_dp-
num_source_rates - 1];
if (!HAS_DP_MST(i915) || intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) return 0; @@ -957,11 +957,11 @@ intel_dp_mst_encoder_init(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, int conn_base_id) /* create encoders */ intel_dp_create_fake_mst_encoders(dig_port); - bios_max_link_rate = intel_bios_dp_max_link_rate(&dig_port->base); ret = drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, &i915->drm, &intel_dp->aux, 16, 3, (u8)dig_port->max_lanes, - (u8)(bios_max_link_rate / 27000), conn_base_id); + (u8)(max_source_rate / 27000), + conn_base_id); if (ret) return ret;
[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]
I'll fix the dpcd part to use kHz on Monday
My apologies as well, not only for coming up with the wrong patch in first place, but also for missing to CC all the maintainers.
-----Original Message----- From: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 6:41 PM To: Cornij, Nikola Nikola.Cornij@amd.com; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Pillai, Aurabindo Aurabindo.Pillai@amd.com; Lipski, Mikita Mikita.Lipski@amd.com; ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com; koba.ko@canonical.com; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; jani.nikula@linux.intel.com; bskeggs@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] drm/i915: Use the correct max source link rate for MST
Alright - I had Ville double check this and give their A-B on IRC (I just need to fix the open coded link_rate_to_bw() here). Since this got broken on drm- misc-next I'm going to go ahead and push the fix there, since I'm not going to be around next Monday or Tuesday and I don't want to leave i915 broken in the interim. Sorry about the noise with this Jani!
As well - I'll get to fixing the dpcd unit usage once I get back on Wednesday (unless Nikola's already gotten to it by then) so we use KHz instead. Although as ville has pointed out, I think we should teach the topology manager to allow passing for the current link rate/lane count during state computation in the long term.
On Fri, 2021-04-30 at 17:45 -0400, Nikola Cornij wrote:
[why] Previously used value was not safe to provide the correct value, i.e. it could be 0 if not not configured, leading to no MST on this platform.
[how] Do not use the value from BIOS, but from the structure populated at encoder initialization time.
Fixes: 98025a62cb00 ("drm/dp_mst: Use Extended Base Receiver Capability DPCD space") Signed-off-by: Nikola Cornij nikola.cornij@amd.com Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c index bf7f8487945c..3642d7578658 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp_mst.c @@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ intel_dp_mst_encoder_init(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, int conn_base_id) struct intel_dp *intel_dp = &dig_port->dp; enum port port = dig_port->base.port; int ret;
int bios_max_link_rate;
int max_source_rate = intel_dp->source_rates[intel_dp-
num_source_rates - 1];
if (!HAS_DP_MST(i915) || intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp)) return 0;
@@ -957,11 +957,11 @@ intel_dp_mst_encoder_init(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port, int conn_base_id)
/* create encoders */ intel_dp_create_fake_mst_encoders(dig_port);
bios_max_link_rate =
intel_bios_dp_max_link_rate(&dig_port->base); ret = drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr_init(&intel_dp->mst_mgr, &i915->drm, &intel_dp->aux, 16, 3, (u8)dig_port->max_lanes,
(u8)(bios_max_link_rate /
27000), conn_base_id);
(u8)(max_source_rate /
+27000),
conn_base_id); if (ret) return ret;
-- Sincerely, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat
Note: I deal with a lot of emails and have a lot of bugs on my plate. If you've asked me a question, are waiting for a review/merge on a patch, etc. and I haven't responded in a while, please feel free to send me another email to check on my status. I don't bite!
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021, "Cornij, Nikola" Nikola.Cornij@amd.com wrote:
I'll fix the dpcd part to use kHz on Monday
I'd appreciate that, thanks. I think it is the better interface.
My apologies as well, not only for coming up with the wrong patch in first place, but also for missing to CC all the maintainers.
The drivers we have are monsters, and it can be tricky to get the details right. All the more important to get the Cc's right; then at least you can blame us afterwards. ;)
Thanks for reacting quickly, though.
BR, Jani.
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org