https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28402
--- Comment #80 from Da Fox da_fox@mad.scientist.com 2010-10-15 05:05:52 PDT --- (In reply to comment #79)
Created an attachment (id=39455)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=39455 Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=28402&attachment=39455
Make sure gtt and vram are not directly adjacent
Does this patch fix the issue?
It should, since it simply puts vram at 0 when it is detected that gtt and vram are adjacent. dmesg says: ---8<--------- radeon 0000:01:00.0: GTT: 256M 0xD0000000 - 0xDFFFFFFF radeon 0000:01:00.0: VRAM: 64M 0x00000000 - 0x03FFFFFF (64M used) --->8--------- so it has moved vram to 0. I'll test it just the same though :) One thing I am wondering is if it is possible to get vram/gtt overlapping with this, since this patch doesn't seem to perform any further checks to ensure this when moving either vram or gtt to 0? Presumable this already handled elsewhere?
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org