Reviewed-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com

Will push to the appropriate branch in a bit

On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 14:51 -0400, Tom Rix wrote:

Sparse reports these issues coregv100.c:27:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_disp_core_mthd_base' was not declared. Should it be static? coregv100.c:43:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_disp_core_mthd_sor' was not declared. Should it be static?

These variables are only used in coregv100.c.  Single file use variables should be static, so add static to their storage-class specifier.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix trix@redhat.com

drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c | 4 ++--  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c index 448a515057c7..1d333c484a49 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/coregv100.c @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@    #include <subdev/timer.h>   -const struct nv50_disp_mthd_list +static const struct nv50_disp_mthd_list  gv100_disp_core_mthd_base = {         .mthd = 0x0000,         .addr = 0x000000, @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ gv100_disp_core_mthd_base = {         }  };   -const struct nv50_disp_mthd_list +static const struct nv50_disp_mthd_list  gv100_disp_core_mthd_sor = {         .mthd = 0x0020,         .addr = 0x000020,